![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?
Quote:
I took those signings to be more competition for Rock, whose contract is less, and who also returns kicks. Of course, anyone can potentially take a spot, Portis' spot included. Betts is getting up there in years so of course they're going to look to replace him in the near future, but I certainly don't think those 3 guys we signed are an attempt to replace or demote him. Also, take a look at Portis' numbers in the 2nd half of the year, since it seems that's what you're doing w/Betts. The running game fell off big time. Do you blame that all on Portis since his "production" dropped? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?
Unless Aldridge is terrible in camp and/or shows he cannot be relied upon in the return game I can see them sticking with him over Rock. I don't think the Zorn regime has as much loyalty to Rock as the previous coach and they have all talked about seeking more explosiveness which Aldridge brings.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,180
|
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?
Quote:
YOU assumed that they were signed to compete for the #2 spot, from what your post said, as if the coaches think Betts needs to be replaced. If what you meant to say was that they signed these guys because they want something more out of the rb position & potentially any of these guys could supplant Betts, and for that matter, Portis. Well, I agree w/you, and if you read my earlier post you'll see I mention that. Basically anyone can be replaced at any time, but that's stating the obvious. You implied 3 guys were signed to specifically compete for the #2 spot. I disagree, but it goes w/out saying that it's possible for them to earn it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|