![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Colt Brennan Says He'll "Play A Ton" In The Preseason
Quote:
Quote:
Here's a rough look at the 2008 Ravens and their performance against other teams. If Flacco indeed "won" games for the Ravens, then I am to assume that this means he produced points at the end of the game that directly led to the win (since to you the fact that they had an elite scoring defense doesn't mean crap to you). Cincy – W – no 4th qtr TD Clev – W – no 4th qtr TD (defense holds opponent to low score) Pit – L – no TDs thrown Ind – L – no TDs thrown Mia – W – no 4th qtr TD (defense holds opponent to low score) Oak – W – no 4th qtr TD (defense holds opponent to low score) Clev – W – 4th qtr TD thrown (strong showing by offense) Hou – W – blow out win (defense holds opponent to low score) NYG – L – blowout loss – no 4th qtr TD thrown Phil – W - 4th qtr TD thrown (strong showing by offense/defense) Cin – W – blow out win (defense holds opponent to low score) Was – W – 4th qtr TD thrown (defense holds opponent to low score) Pit – L – no TDs thrown Dal – W – 4th qtr TD thrown (strong showing by offense/defense) Jax – W – no TDs thrown (defense holds opponent to low score) I looked at 4th Qtr TDs thrown by Flacco (yes I know I am simplifying this a bit, disregarding his performance that indirectly resulted in points). Now, in the two games I bolded, Flacco did have a strong offensive showing, the opposing teams put up points against the Ravens, and the ability of Flacco to put up points on the board were important to the win. However, in most of the other games, Flacco did not have to "win" the game as you put it, most of the time the Ravens defense held the opposing team under 14 pts.; and then there are those games where they lost.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
||
![]() |
|
|