![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
It's hard not to like Portis even with all the stupid stuff he pulls, but he isn't even close to the top 5 runningbacks. Whens the last time you have seen him outrun anyone. He's not bad but dont get hurt hes not in top 5 list, maybe it will motivate him.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
I like Portis, but not for the money he makes. RB seems to be the easiest position to fill, and the best teams seem to put their money elsewhere... O and D line, for example. Look at the Pats. Anyone they stick in the backfield seems to get 100 yards. It's because they are solid everywhere else - passing game, O-line, etc. Would prefer to see the skins build a solid foundation, so that players at skill positions can be interchanged without the team missing a beat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Not even close? come on. Riggins could never out run anyone himself and where would you rank him?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Riggo was a power back, a bruiser that was used to pound the ball. He was never considered a breakaway threat. Thats why they called him The Diesel. CP is a speed back that can take a pounding. Big difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Riggins had wheels. Like someone else said, he was a 2-time 100M sprint champ in Kansas. There are some good videos on Youtube of him just blowing by defenders and, of course, one of the most memorable runs in Super Bowl history is him busting a tackle and taking it 40 plus yards to the house. He was da man.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Riggo outran the cowpukes < D. Thurman > for a 66 yd td run in 79 , and outran the "killer Bees " in Super Bowl 17 . Riggo was not quick , but did have very good top speed .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Quote:
But I agree with the basic point. Even if CP is no longer a home run threat he still does many other things really well, and since when is being able to outrun people the main criteria for being a great back? Last edited by MTK; 07-07-2009 at 02:12 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
I can't speak about guys i didnt watch play, i'm just going by the great running backs i watched growing up and they outran the defenders on a consistant basis. I was a little strong in saying not even close, but when i watch portis i'm constantly thinking to myself "if that was peterson or williams he wouldnt have gone down.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Kinda hard to say he's not even close considering he was 4th overall in the league in rushing last year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Also from NFL.com. Obviously any of these lists would be subjective.
As more teams split carries, these five backs stand above the rest
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
We were statistically the 4th best defense, do you think we had the 4th best defense last year? Yeah saying not even close was harsh, but if you could pick from any team right now who you want to start at running back, would portis be in yalls top 5?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Along with being 4th in rushing yards, he was 4th in total yards (1,705), and 4th in 100 yard games (6). I don't think it's that unrealstic to call him a top 5 back.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redskins Country
Age: 44
Posts: 10
|
Re: Marshall Faulk's Top 5 RB's...No Portis?!
Quote:
In no particular order.... Clinton Portis, Westbrook, Steven Jackson, LaDanian Tomlison, Marion Barber |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|