Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Select Jarmon in 3rd Round of Supplemental Draft

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Jeremy Jarmon... good move or bad move?
Good move 155 95.09%
Bad move 8 4.91%
Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2009, 06:24 PM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins Select Jarmon in 3rd Round of Supplemental Draft

I'm not exactly sure that we're the best fit for him, given the potential turnover on our defensive coaching staff within a year or two, but my only concern is that we might have overpaid a bit.

Because outside of that, SEC defensive linemen tend to have no issue making the jump to the next level and and Jarmon appears to be no exception.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 06:27 PM   #2
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Redskins Select Jarmon in 3rd Round of Supplemental Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I'm not exactly sure that we're the best fit for him, given the potential turnover on our defensive coaching staff within a year or two, but my only concern is that we might have overpaid a bit.

Because outside of that, SEC defensive linemen tend to have no issue making the jump to the next level and and Jarmon appears to be no exception.
With 5 teams ready to take him in the 4th it seems like we paid the necessary price to get him.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 06:31 PM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins Select Jarmon in 3rd Round of Supplemental Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
With 5 teams ready to take him in the 4th it seems like we paid the necessary price to get him.
Of course. I'm just suggesting that he might have been overvalued by multiple teams with less talent than use due to the fact that they plan on using him this year. Whereas, he fits into our puzzle as a depth guy in year one. So we might have been able to get a comparable player in say, the 4th or 5th round next year had we waited.

But, again, if the guy turns out to be an average 2nd round talent (2-3 wins added over the next 4.5 seasons), you aren't going to hear not one complaint out of me.

Kudos to the FO for putting the chips in the middle here, but they better be right on their assessment.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 06:36 PM   #4
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 56
Posts: 4,719
Re: Redskins Select Jarmon in 3rd Round of Supplemental Draft

I'm good with the pick--stack the D and hopefully we can win some games with less offense, giving Zorn more time to get it going.

Vinny clearly is of the "bird in the hand" school--at least the guy is young!
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.50674 seconds with 12 queries