Betts to be the 3rd Down Back? - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Betts to be the 3rd Down Back?

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Betts to be the 3rd Down Back?

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

08-21-2009, 03:51 PM #8

CRedskinsRule

Living Legend

Join Date: Aug 2008

Age: 58

Posts: 21,699

Re: Betts to be the 3rd Down Back?

Personally, I would rather Betts be in on 2nd, gives a nice versatility for the play action, but won't face all out blitzers. Portis is an awesome pass blocker, Betts - just ok. and whatever we do we need to make sure we don't burn out CP against STL, KC and TB!

CRedskinsRule

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by CRedskinsRule

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 3.29654 seconds with 11 queries

08-21-2009, 03:51 PM	#8
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 58 Posts: 21,699	Re: Betts to be the 3rd Down Back? Personally, I would rather Betts be in on 2nd, gives a nice versatility for the play action, but won't face all out blitzers. Portis is an awesome pass blocker, Betts - just ok. and whatever we do we need to make sure we don't burn out CP against STL, KC and TB!