Redskins to SIgn QB Andre Woodson to PS

[vallin21]

Woodson was once considered a high pick but his stock dipped quick, but regardless the kid has potential could win a spot next year.

[A10sROCK]

Woodson had a QB rating of 38; Chase had a QB rating of 115.

Who CARES how you play - all that matters is to be the right height!

BTW - in the latest WaPo article BOTH Zorn AND Cerrato said they wanted to keep Daniels. Confusion????????????

[A10sROCK]

woodson will definitely be mined for his Giants playbook knowledge.

Tell me why we let Dixon go to the Eagles and kept Wynn?

Both Colt [49 QB rating] and Woodson [38 rating] should be a major competition next PS against the old guy with a walker.....

[BleedBurgundy]

Originally Posted by A10sROCK

woodson will definitely be mined for his Giants playbook knowledge.

Tell me why we let Dixon go to the Eagles and kept Wynn?

Both Colt [49 QB rating] and Woodson [38 rating] should be a major competition next PS against the old guy with a walker.....

Are you using Madden QB ratings to evaluate players?

[Lotus]

I'm pretty sure that Woodson can run the scout team as well as Chase could. And, pretty much, that is all that 3rd team QB's ever do.

[Redskin Warrior]

[QUOTE=BleedBurgundy;585415]Are you using Madden QB ratings to evaluate players?[/QUOTELM

LMAO!!!!

[SC Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by A10sROCK

Woodson had a QB rating of 38; Chase had a QB rating of 115.

Who CARES how you play - all that matters is to be the right height!

BTW - in the latest WaPo article BOTH Zorn AND Cerrato said they wanted to keep Daniels. Confusion????????????

I think you misread the situation slightly. Daniel was not cut because of his height. The Redskins FO made a calculated risk, believing they could get him on to their PS, only carry two QBs on the active roster, and use that spot to carry an extra o-lineman. Now that is not to say that they should not be chastised for the decision. I have no clue why Mike Williams is still on this team. He never should have been signed to this team and the Redskins should have drafted o-line depth in the 5th or kept Jon Jansen instead of relying on this guy (and signing Williams did impact those other moves, which makes the Williams signing just that much worse). Now they are just hoping that a bad decision somehow turns around but in the process they have now lost another player.

Signing Andre Woodson was not done because he is 6'5", he was just an available body and he was signed to cover up for losing Daniel. In my opinion, as you can see above, the original sin here is the signing of Mike Williams.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by A10sROCK

Woodson had a QB rating of 38; Chase had a QB rating of 115.

Who CARES how you play - all that matters is to be the right height!

BTW - in the latest WaPo article BOTH Zorn AND Cerrato said they wanted to keep Daniels. Confusion????????????

So you obviously didn't see Daniel play against the Jax's first-team defense right? Obviously to you preseason ratings are very very very important, right?

Originally Posted by A10sROCK

woodson will definitely be mined for his Giants playbook knowledge.

Tell me why we let Dixon go to the Eagles and kept Wynn?

Both Colt [49 QB rating] and Woodson [38 rating] should be a major competition next PS against the old guy with a walker.....

Dixon was probably let go b/c we spent 41 mil on a Pro Bowl DT. And can you please stop obsessing having a 3rd string QB? If Todd Collins or a 3rd string QB have to start, we would be in a world of trouble.

Mindless rants are fun every once in a while, not in every post you make.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

So you obviously didn't see Daniel play against the Jax's first-team defense right? Obviously to you preseason ratings are very very very important, right?



Dixon was probably let go b/c we spent 41 mil on a Pro Bowl DT. And can you please stop obsessing having a 3rd string QB? If Todd Collins or a 3rd string QB have to start, we would be in a world of trouble.

Mindless rants are fun every once in a while, not in every post you make.

Hey Rush, why would we be in a world of trouble with Collins in there? The guy went 5-0 two seasons ago to save a playoff run. Didn't look too bad to me, but what happens if JC goes down early season, then Todd gets nailed later on? Why automatically throw the season away. I don't think Chase or Colt would have set the gridiron on fire, but they wouldn't have necessarily blown the season either. Better watch yourself when nailing someone for "mindless rants". We owe our last playoff appearance to Todd!!!!!

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

Hey Rush, why would we be in a world of trouble with Collins in there? The guy went 5-0 two seasons ago to save a playoff run. Didn't look too bad to me, but what happens if JC goes down early season, then Todd gets nailed later on? Why automatically throw the season away. I don't think Chase or Colt would have set the gridiron on fire, but they wouldn't have necessarily blown the season either. Better watch yourself when nailing someone for "mindless rants". We owe our last playoff appearance to Todd!!!!!

First, who the hell is rush?

Second, if you read these guy's posts, you will see that they are nothing but mindless rants.

Third, I am not discrediting nor forgetting Todd Collins' value to our team. I think he's a good back up and I think we would be in good shape if JC goes down. I'd rather that this didn't happen, but I'm fine with him as a back up.

Fourth, I think people are overreacting at us not keeping a third QB. I think having our 3rd string QB start a game is one of the worst case scenario any team can go through. You are right, I don't think the season will be down the shitter, but I don't think many teams have been successful with their 3rd string leading the way (you could look it up if you want, I haven't, but I think I would remember if that had happened).

Fifth, I don't think I need to "watch myself" when responding to a mindless rant. I usually try to make somewhat intelligent posts (as many people do here) and will be critical when someone just blasts some mindless none sense about the team.

[roth74va]

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

I don't think Chase or Colt would have set the gridiron on fire, but they wouldn't have necessarily blown the season either.

Colt Brennan and/or Chase Daniel as your starting quarterback = your season just went to hell in a handbasket.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by vallin21

Woodson was once considered a high pick but his stock dipped quick, but regardless the kid has potential could win a spot next year.

WTF. So why did we bother signing Daniel then if they regarded him as too short? This is beginning to bug me. It is like these bastards still don't have a solid rebuilding plan in place and doing shit by the seat of their pants. Daniel did more damage at Mizzou than this kid did at Kentucky.

[vallin21]

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

WTF. So why did we bother signing Daniel then if they regarded him as too short? This is beginning to bug me. It is like these bastards still don't have a solid rebuilding plan in place and doing shit by the seat of their pants. Daniel did more damage at Mizzou than this kid did at Kentucky.

Bro I totally agree you, Daniel looked just as good as he did at Mizzou, but signing Woodson to the PS aint that bad. Edwin Williams should be on the PS. Wynn, and Bastiste should be cut, and Westbrook sure as hell doesn't deserve to dress every sunday, and personally I would have cut Montgomery and replaced him w/ Dixon . Those 3 spots should belong to Daniel, Bridges, and Dixon.