![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
The scheme works, but as the article points out they just need better execution of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
But what makes Pittsburgh so much better at it then us? Going by the article I'm assuming we have the same schemes. I'm really not trying to be smartass in any way I'm just curious. If it's purely execution then I'm fine with the scheme because it works very well for Pitt. If they do something differently than us I'd like to know what it is. I may be wrong but I think our personell should put us on the same level as them. I definitely believe our execution is lacking at this point and expect it to get better, it's only been one game and maybe that is the answer.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
Quote:
Everyone (not pointing you out) seems to want all these answers after just one game, and really it's just not that cut and dry. We still have 15 games left, alot can and will happen over the course of the season. I think too many people are taking the results of one game, putting it under the microscope, and assuming that's how the rest of the year will go. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 56
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
Quote:
Unless I'm missing something, the Giants, who won 12 games last year, scored 16 offensive points and our defense caused 1 interception and 1 fumble. I'm not sure I'm ready to throw the defense under the bus yet.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
And wasn't our Defense on the field for like 80% of the first half? I would say we did an impressive job against the Giants on Defense for being fucked on the field so long because our offense didn't substain drives.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 45
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
Here here, as frustrating as it is to lose to the Giants on opening day, and see guys not play as expected, it was one game. The first game at that. We'll bounce back!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: Interesting read on our secondary philosophy
Quote:
Have to agree with you, i'm as mad as the next Die Hard Skin Fan of the result against the giants but i tell myself it's one game relax we will right the ship. HTTR. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|