![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
I was listening to 980am today on the way home from BWI, and I've spent the last hour or so reading this board. I've seen and heard a bunch of "it's only 2 games" comments. It's not 2 games, it's 10. No more excuses. Kevin Sheehan said how "we're so close to finding those game changing sacks and turnovers," and "getting hung up on only scoring 9 points is a shortsighted view." I strongly disagree. The time is now. This current regime has had 9 preseason and 18 regular season games to figure it out, and it's not coming together. This isn't horseshoes. I don't give a damn about "close." I'm SO SICK of hearing crap like, "gosh our offense can really move the ball, but..." No more buts. We don't score. We just don't. Points win games, not yards. It needs to change right away. I think Zorn's leash can be measured in inches, not feet right now. Get it together or get out JZ. My patience is gone.
__________________
Tardy Last edited by GMScud; 09-21-2009 at 03:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,698
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
last year at the end of the season, we were not moving the ball effectively, especially, from the 50 to the 20, and Zorn in the offseason said he was focusing on fixing that. we moved the ball effectively in both games in that area of the field. I would call it medium rare right now. a little more seasoning, and we might get some well done out of it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
The difference, of course, is that in spite of the playcalling, the Redskins got three throws into the end zone yesterday (1 of them by Portis), and had a 0% success rate. Keep getting 3-5 throws into the end zone a game and we're going to beat a lot of teams. Last year, we usually had one or two drives into the red zone in a game, and thusly, 20 points would have been a solid effort. Now, we're on the verge of 3 TDs a game, and while that doesn't sound like much, it's the difference between 16 PPG (1 TD, 3 FG) and 24 PPG (3 TD, 1 FG), if we execute. The point is we didn't just make it inside the red zone 4 times, we made it inside the ten 4 times.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
From the 50 to the 20? So what? Again, points win games, not yards. Zorn should be focused on fixing moving the ball from wherever our possession begins to the endzone. We were just barely good enough to beat a doormat. Even during our 6-2 start last year, our largest margin of victory was 8 over the winless Lions. Even when "successful" in this offense points have been scarce, and it doesn't look a ton better right now. Moving the ball well outside of the redzone only to stall repeatedly doesn't exactly give me the warm and fuzzies.
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,698
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
No disrespect dude, but that's a lame fall back excuse for a team that is really really struggling.
I'll take the win of course, and I'm glad we're not 0-2, but I have basically no confidence in our offense. Have you looked at the second half of our schedule? We're gonna get kicked into the dirt if we don't turn it around. Fortunately we play some less than stellar teams over the course of the next month. We'll see.
__________________
Tardy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,698
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
so I made the bottom line statement. we won. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
I'm happy we came out with a W, but not pleased with the way we played. We dominated the stat sheet numerous times last year and still couldn't put anyone away. Looks like more of the same if you ask me.
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
Yes, the sky is not falling. I am not panicking. I am frustrated to see a talented Redskins team not perform up to their talent level. That is on the coaches and the players. Many people get upset on this site when the Redskins do not get the respect from the national media in power rankings or other print. Well taking a "win is a win" attitude is not going to gain you respect. Playing good/sound football will. Even if you lose to a really good team but you play well, there is nothing to be ashamed of. I was embarrassed as a Redskins fan on Sunday. I hope not to say this against the Lions. I hope the offense finds its spark and the pass rush becomes consistent and ferocious. We are so close to being a really good team. Campbell and Zorn's necks are stretched out right now. It is do or die time for them as Redskins. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|