Redskins vs. Panthers Gameday Thread

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

You mean Blache.

How in the hell do you blame the D after they set up the only points we had and the O could have just sat on the bench. For people to keep blaming our bad play on the D have no clue about football or are not watching the games.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by firstdown

How in the hell do you blame the D after they set up the only points we had and the O could have just sat on the bench. For people to keep blaming our bad play on the D have no clue about football or are not watching the games.

When you spend $153 mil on D, then you better be the best D out there. Look at the 49ers D?

[tmandoug1]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

When you spend $153 mil on D, then you better be the best D out there. Look at the 49ers D?

Oh stop, they were on the field the whole game, just stop it man.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

When you spend $153 mil on D, then you better be the best D out there. Look at the 49ers D?

I'm not looking atr how much money was spent I'm looking at who lost the game. It was the O and most of all the O Line. I just wish the D was our problem.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by firstdown

I'm not looking atr how much money was spent I'm looking at who lost the game. It was the O and most of all the O Line. I just wish the D was our problem.

It was both, lack of depth on the OL and the inability to stop the offense on the D.

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

It was both, lack of depth on the OL and the inability to stop the offense on the D.

I just don't know why Orakpo isnt a full time DE. He seems like he is always in the backfield when he lines up at end.

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

I just don't know why Orakpo isnt a full time DE. He seems like he is always in the backfield when he lines up at end.

Nobody understands this..and now you can't ask Blache about it.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

It was both, lack of depth on the OL and the inability to stop the offense on the D.

Ok if you want to think that. If our O could score any points at all in a game we would be 4/1 maybe 5/0. I guess if you think that every D should play like the Ravens did back when they won the SB then you may have a point but to expect that is just crazy. Our D does their job pretty much every game but our O sucks. Yes they SUCK.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Ok if you want to think that. If our O could score any points at all in a game we would be 4/1 maybe 5/0. I guess if you think that every D should play like the Ravens did back when they won the SB then you may have a point but to expect that is just crazy. Our D does their job pretty much every game but our O sucks. Yes they SUCK.

I'm not disagreeing on the O, but our D has been getting us killed on 3rd down conversions all season long.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I'm not disagreeing on the O, but our D has been getting us killed on 3rd down conversions all season long.

D's will get burned on 3rd down conversions but they have done their job. The problem is that our O has not scored any points so when the D does get burned it has a greater effect on the out come of the game.

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I'm not disagreeing on the O, but our D has been getting us killed on 3rd down conversions all season long.

I agree. Neither side of the ball is playing well. We expected the D to take up the slack with a developing O this year but it's just not happening. There is no favoritism. The O sucks. I just expected the D to play better this year and be able to stop drives better than last year.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

When you spend $153 mil on D, then you better be the best D out there. Look at the 49ers D?

The same 49ers D that was getting lit up at home at the hands of ATL?