Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why we need to rout for 2-14

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2009, 10:40 AM   #1
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Why we need to rout for 2-14

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I always hate stuff like this. While I have given up all hope in regard to this season, each week when I tune in I'll be rooting for a win, no question. Are people really rooting against their own team??
im with you. i know my skins are a bad team. but i will never, and i mean never, root for them to lose. stupid thread
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 10:44 AM   #2
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,022
Re: Why we need to rout for 2-14

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
im with you. i know my skins are a bad team. but i will never, and i mean never, root for them to lose. stupid thread
Agree 100%. I cant stand arguements like this. I have a friend who actually places bets against his team and states "well if they win or lose, ill be happy either way".....can never root against my team
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.90132 seconds with 11 queries