![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: As the new GM would you go after Ronnie Brown?
With a better offensive line, cheaper running backs can thrive. Unless you're talking about Adrian Peterson, you wait until the third round or later to start drafting backs. And you absolutely don't break the bank on a high priced free agent running back.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the glorious city of DC
Posts: 741
|
Re: As the new GM would you go after Ronnie Brown?
naaahhh.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: As the new GM would you go after Ronnie Brown?
Quote:
go skins!!
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: As the new GM would you go after Ronnie Brown?
Quote:
I'm saying, you shouldn't necessarily wait until the third round. Most teams already avoid RBs in the top half of the NFL draft, but there's first round running backs, just like first round quarterbacks, and first round cornerbacks, and first round TEs. Running backs have a specific control over the outcome over the game second to only quarterbacks, so it's clearly critical that you have a good one. Just like any other position, if you can find a "first round" talent in the fourth round, you do it obviously. Where teams tend to screw up is rewarding runners with monster second contracts (LJ, Shaun Alexander) for past performance. It's disloyal to just let them walk after having a great season, but the alternative of dead money to a player who can't produce more than justifies the decision to let an incredibly productive 27 or 28 year old RB walk.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|