![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Why Are We So Divided On Jason Campbell?
Maybe the mistake was switching Campbell to a West Coast (and yes I know he ran it one year in college) when he had just spent three NFL years learning the Gibbs/Saunders' system
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Why Are We So Divided On Jason Campbell?
Isnt that what all but the most die-hard Campbell apologists have been saying for the past two years? Campbells a square peg and the WCO is a round hole. It was utter foolishness of Cerrato to try and fit them together.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Why Are We So Divided On Jason Campbell?
Thats a whole other ball of wax. No one is talking about this fact that we switched our offensive philosophies to one that maybe didn't match our personel very well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Why Are We So Divided On Jason Campbell?
Quote:
We got that good half-season from Portis by basically putting the WCO principals on the back-burner while we "ran to win." We were winning because we were running well, and Campbell was playing well because we were running well. But that running came at the expense of necessary development in the WCO. The hope was that a healthy OL this year could lead to a significant developement in the offense, but that was more hope than reality.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|