Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2009, 02:09 PM   #1
RedskinMike
Special Teams
 
RedskinMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 46
Posts: 416
Re: Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
Why Dungy over Shan?

While I like Tony Dungy, Jim Caldwell has proven b/c you win w/ Peyton Manning it doesn't mean you are necessariy mean you are the best coach in the league.

I like TD and he's a winner everywhere he's been. I guess I just don't like his god awful offenses in TB. His defense...excellent.

Seems to me, Shanahan is more of a complete coach, offense and defense. Just MO.
Shanahan is by no means known for defenses quite the opposite in fact.
RedskinMike is offline  
Old 12-18-2009, 02:17 PM   #2
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

My question is would the Redskins be disrespectful enough to name Shanahan coach while Zorn is coaching with 3 games to go? Why bother playing those games and not firing Zorn on the spot since he's being replaced? Something doesn't jive with the story that it is a done deal.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline  
Old 12-18-2009, 02:27 PM   #3
Trample the Elderly
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
Re: Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
My question is would the Redskins be disrespectful enough to name Shanahan coach while Zorn is coaching with 3 games to go? Why bother playing those games and not firing Zorn on the spot since he's being replaced? Something doesn't jive with the story that it is a done deal.
They're trying to sell stories bro!
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood.
Trample the Elderly is offline  
Old 12-18-2009, 03:23 PM   #4
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
My question is would the Redskins be disrespectful enough to name Shanahan coach while Zorn is coaching with 3 games to go? Why bother playing those games and not firing Zorn on the spot since he's being replaced? Something doesn't jive with the story that it is a done deal.
Shanahan is being locked up by Snyder NOW since Dallas is waiting to lose the last few games before making a decision on Wade staying or going.

Smart move by Snyder to take the Cowboys' rumored next coach away from them.

This is why they're locking up a new coach before the end of the season when it has been stated Zorn will stay the remainder of the year.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 12-18-2009, 03:11 PM   #5
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinMike View Post
Shanahan is by no means known for defenses quite the opposite in fact.
Yes, i'd agree, he's more known for offense. But they've also had some decent defenses. I haven't looked up the stats but going purely from memory.
redsk1 is offline  
Old 12-18-2009, 03:14 PM   #6
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Report: Shanahan in Talks with Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
Yes, i'd agree, he's more known for offense. But they've also had some decent defenses. I haven't looked up the stats but going purely from memory.
Shanahan would ALREADY have a top defense built for him coming into this job. Unlike in Denver, he can concentrate solely on building the offense, which is our area of need....and still have a dominant defense. I believe he should keep Blache and not change a thing on D, except to upgrade. (Carlos, add a LB to get 'Rak on DE full-time)
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.90495 seconds with 11 queries