Do You Want Jason Campbell Back in 2010?

[MTK]

His final numbers:

3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating

All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.

[SKINS73]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

His final numbers:

3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating

All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.

I've already tried using this logic in other threads Matty. There are still many people who don't want Campbell back. Campbell's name is associated with bad seasons and for that reason he's the scapegoat. I think there are many more areas that need to be addressed first. Get rid of the below average players before the ones who finished slightly above average.

[SKINS73]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

His final numbers:

3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating

All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.

Just an FYI - Carson Palmer's numbers:

3,094, 21 TDs, 13 INTs, 60.5% completions, 83.6 rating

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by SKINS73

Just an FYI - Carson Palmer's numbers:

3,094, 21 TDs, 13 INTs, 60.5% completions, 83.6 rating

Plus a far better running game and line for Carson.


The poll answer is YES.

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by SKINS73

Just an FYI - Carson Palmer's numbers:

3,094, 21 TDs, 13 INTs, 60.5% completions, 83.6 rating

before yesterday's game on JC's 3,000 passing yds, more than 2,000 came after the catch. about 58% of his pass yds are from yac. thats by far more than any other team in the nfl.

he is what he is. an average qb with most of his completions being within 10 yds.

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

before yesterday's game on JC's 3,000 passing yds, more than 2,000 came after the catch. about 58% of his pass yds are from yac. thats by far more than any other team in the nfl.

he is what he is. an average qb with most of his completions being within 10 yds.

He's also what virtually every analyst who did a Redskins game said he is, a QB that a team can win with. He's not, and will probably never will be, elite at the level of a Peyton, Brady, Brees but in the right situation I think he can be every bit of the Eli, Schaub, McNabb type of QB. He's not going to carry a team but he's not going to torpedo your teams chances either.

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

He's also what virtually every analyst who did a Redskins game said he is, a QB that a team can win with. He's not, and will probably never will be, elite at the level of a Peyton, Brady, Brees but in the right situation I think he can be every bit of the Eli, Schaub, McNabb type of QB. He's not going to carry a team but he's not going to torpedo your teams chances either.

yeah i know and agree. the announcer yesterday said the same "you can win with jason campbell" mantra but he also said "things just dont process quickly enough for him". i agree with both, that you can win with JC and that his D reads and decision making just doesnt click fast enough.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

yeah i know and agree. the announcer yesterday said the same "you can win with jason campbell" mantra but he also said "things just dont process quickly enough for him". i agree with both, that you can win with JC and that his D reads and decision making just doesnt click fast enough.

Those are contradictory statements by that guy. Basically he is saying he has the tools, but is too slow to read the defense quickly enough to be a winner. This guy just lost to Norv's second and 3rd stringers yesterday. Great stats, but still lost. THe only real stat in my mind that counts is Ws. Look at Flacco, crappy stats yardage wise, but he wins. JC isn't going to have a solid team in place for another 2-4 seasons. Do you think we will keep him for that long? Also, he only "broke out" when the season was a total loss, he sucked monkey balls beforehand. Sure you can chalk it up to Zorn, but his execution still sucked for the most part. Guy has been around too long keeping the bad habits he still has.

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

Those are contradictory statements by that guy. Basically he is saying he has the tools, but is too slow to read the defense quickly enough to be a winner. This guy just lost to Norv's second and 3rd stringers yesterday. Great stats, but still lost. THe only real stat in my mind that counts is Ws. Look at Flacco, crappy stats yardage wise, but he wins. JC isn't going to have a solid team in place for another 2-4 seasons. Do you think we will keep him for that long? Also, he only "broke out" when the season was a total loss, he sucked monkey balls beforehand. Sure you can chalk it up to Zorn, but his execution still sucked for the most part. Guy has been around too long keeping the bad habits he still has.

Actually what he said was that 'in the pocket, Campbell seems slow in his progressions' while making the point that he thinks JC is much more effective rolling out and making decisions on the move.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

He's also what virtually every analyst who did a Redskins game said he is, a QB that a team can win with. He's not, and will probably never will be, elite at the level of a Peyton, Brady, Brees but in the right situation I think he can be every bit of the Eli, Schaub, McNabb type of QB. He's not going to carry a team but he's not going to torpedo your teams chances either.

the teams w/ elite qb play have a better chance of winning. if the fo thinks bradford is the guy then we should take him.

[SouperMeister]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

His final numbers:

3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating

All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.

Very servicable numbers considering that this team had a terrible running game and subpar pass protection. The Snyder Doctrine of drafting perimeter/skill position players (especially DB's and WR's) has failed Campbell and the franchise miserably. I don't care if Eric Berry is the 2nd coming of Ed Reed in the 2010 draft. Consistently good teams win the battle in the trenches. It is high time to address the O-line early and often. Give Campbell a fighting chance in the pocket - even Tom Brady could not function behind this sieve.

[Trample the Elderly]

I'll be happy with the decision that the new administration makes, because it's not Cerrato's dumb ass.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

His final numbers:

3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs, 64.5% completions, 86.4 rating

All while playing behind a bad OL. Seems like a guy worth keeping around to me.

mark brunell had similar numbers and everyone wanted to run him off.