Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Jason Campbells response to Portis

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Campbell vs. Portis: who do you side with?
Campbell 84 95.45%
Portis 4 4.55%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2010, 08:08 PM   #1
SkinEmAll
Special Teams
 
SkinEmAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BillysBurg, Va.
Posts: 489
Re: Jason Campbells response to Portis

WOW! I cant believe JC fired off like that, hey maybe its a good thing, you know JC gettin a little fire under his ass. This isnt helping CP at all, its gonna get very very interesting.
SkinEmAll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 01:43 AM   #2
dgw090767
Camp Scrub
 
dgw090767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 25
Re: Jason Campbells response to Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinEmAll View Post
WOW! I cant believe JC fired off like that, hey maybe its a good thing, you know JC gettin a little fire under his ass. This isnt helping CP at all, its gonna get very very interesting.
The problem with people being surprised by JC's response is that in our current culture we mistake "meekness for weakness". Don't be fooled and think this all of a sudden rose up in JC. It was there all the time, but finally the right buttons were pushed.

Meekness is not equated to weakness. Meekness is no more than power under control.
dgw090767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 01:44 AM   #3
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Jason Campbells response to Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgw090767 View Post
The problem with people being surprised by JC's response is that in our current culture we mistake "meekness for weakness". Don't be fooled and think this all of a sudden rose up in JC. It was there all the time, but finally the right buttons were pushed.

Meakness is not equated to weakness. Meakness is no more than power under control.
Good post.

I would add that JC likely kept it under his hat so as to not be an in-season distraction. This week the gloves can come off.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:10 AM   #4
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
Re: Jason Campbells response to Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgw090767 View Post
The problem with people being surprised by JC's response is that in our current culture we mistake "meekness for weakness". Don't be fooled and think this all of a sudden rose up in JC. It was there all the time, but finally the right buttons were pushed.

Meekness is not equated to weakness. Meekness is no more than power under control.
Absolutely agree. I've always thought that about Campbell...
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.18754 seconds with 12 queries