![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: ESPN's Schefter channels his energy into NFL
Quote:
If there's a situation where both Clausen and Bradford are available at No. 4, it's a great sign that the collective assumption is that both are going to be pretty reliant on teammates and coaches to help make their careers. While, in my opinion, that's part of the equation for a future successful team, it's also the kind of player that can be found later on in the draft. IMO, that's the difference between the "first overall" type quarterback, and you're run of the mill first rounder. We already have a standard level first rounder who hardly needs to be shipped out of town on a rail. Without question, if you can get a first overall type at No. 4, you take him, but I do not believe that you can have that surefire first overall guy who falls to No. 4. Matt Ryan fell to No. 3 because he had a Parcells' type picking at number one, and the Rams had Bulger at QB at the time (which didn't make it the right move, simply defensable). The only first overall type who has ever fallen to No. 4, I think, is Philip Rivers, and he wasn't even the first quarterback selected. I guess, if the Redskins come to the conclusion that (for example) Sam Bradford is a way better player than Jimmy Clausen, and Clausen goes No. 1 overall, they could be defended for taking Bradford at No. 4. But that's it. That's the only way.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|