Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Jason campbells trade value

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2010, 07:27 PM   #1
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Jason campbells trade value

I like how everyone is answering that JC has zero trade value and yet it seems that everyone wants to keep him as our starting QB.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:31 PM   #2
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldSkins View Post
I like how everyone is answering that JC has zero trade value and yet it seems that everyone wants to keep him as our starting QB.
It's going to be hard to trade anyone with the possibility of a work stoppage in 2011. Furthermore, Campbell is the best option right now until we can develop a QB or until we have a team good enough that a rookie can come in and have success (like Flacco or Sanchez).
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 09:10 AM   #3
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
It's going to be hard to trade anyone with the possibility of a work stoppage in 2011. Furthermore, Campbell is the best option right now until we can develop a QB or until we have a team good enough that a rookie can come in and have success (like Flacco or Sanchez).
I agree, there are so many intangibles' involved as far as long range planning is concerned because of the uncertainty surrounding the status of a CBA.

I've said it before, Jason Campbell is one of the most difficult QB's to evaluate mainly because of the many unsettling circumstances within the teams framework that make a fair and unbiased evaluation virtually impossible. One cannot argue that his numbers have improved each year he has been the starting QB, and there has to be some value in progress. I don't think they will trade Campbell even if it is their intention to draft a QB for the future. Despite Campbells' shortcomings, he does have value if you look at his numbers in comparison. Speculation will continue to run rampant however until the draft, free agency and all other pre-season evaluations have been exhausted.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:33 PM   #4
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Jason campbells trade value

I think JC has some real trade value although it is hard to put a number on it. Maybe a #3 or #4. For all of his failings, he has a lot of starting experience and has had some success. There are some teams for whom he might be an upgrade as a starter. He would be a valued #2 for most teams.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:35 PM   #5
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldSkins View Post
I like how everyone is answering that JC has zero trade value and yet it seems that everyone wants to keep him as our starting QB.
I think it hard to evaluate him to give him any trade value but with better pieces around him he might be worth keeping.
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:58 PM   #6
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldSkins View Post
I like how everyone is answering that JC has zero trade value and yet it seems that everyone wants to keep him as our starting QB.

well, he was passed over for kyle orton.yes,thats right, kyle orton
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 08:02 PM   #7
Redskin301
Camp Scrub
 
Redskin301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
well, he was passed over for kyle orton.yes,thats right, kyle orton
I'd take orton over Jcam any day
Redskin301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 08:12 PM   #8
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin301 View Post
I'd take orton over Jcam any day

thats exactly why campbell has no trade value.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 08:13 PM   #9
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin301 View Post
I'd take orton over Jcam any day
I don't know how Orton is better. His team had a 2nd half of the season collapse just like the Redskins last season (and that's with a solid line and Brandon Marshall). Although, I doubt Orton will be back with Denver next season.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 08:46 PM   #10
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I don't know how Orton is better. His team had a 2nd half of the season collapse just like the Redskins last season (and that's with a solid line and Brandon Marshall). Although, I doubt Orton will be back with Denver next season.
But it's his first year in a new system? If it works for Jason Campbell it can work for Kyle Orton.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 09:12 PM   #11
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
well, he was passed over for kyle orton.yes,thats right, kyle orton

Sounds good - - if only it were correct. And it is not...


The Broncos did not trade Jay Cutler for Kyle Orton even up. So, the Bronx did not choose Kyle Orton over Jason Campbell even up.


Go back and look at the trade that made that move happen. I believe the entire transaction was this - - but I may be "misremembering" to use a word coined by Roger Clemens:

Bears get Jay Cutler + fifth round pick.


Broncos get Kyle Orton + TWO first round picks + a third round pick.

Do you know what "other compensation" the Skins offered the Broncos to make that deal over and above Jason Campbell? I do not. RUMOR is that all they would cough up was one first round pick + Campbell and nothing more. But I don't know if that RUMOR is right nor do I know what they may have offered in the deal.


BTW, Jay Cutler will not turn out to be worth what the Bears paid for him in terms of players and draft picks - - unless all of the Broncos picks turn out to be cabbage patch dolls.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 09:39 PM   #12
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Sounds good - - if only it were correct. And it is not....
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 09:46 PM   #13
Redskin301
Camp Scrub
 
Redskin301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.
are offer was 2 first and Jcam the bears gave orton two 1st and a 3rd
Redskin301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 09:46 PM   #14
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.
Well McD sort of chose Orton over Cutler too.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 09:49 PM   #15
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Jason campbells trade value

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.
If that is what you call it and if you ignore all of the rest of the parts of the deal that went down, that is a good indication as to why there aren't a half-dozen NFL teams knocking down your doors to make you their Director of Player Personnel or their GM.


It was NEVER a choice of Cutler/Campbell/Orton. If it were that simple, Danny Boy would have bid higher in terms of money for the three of them and gotten Orotn - - whom the Skins lusted after - - than the notoriously cheap Bears. This was a deal that Danny Boy's money could not make all by itself.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.39349 seconds with 11 queries