Jason campbells trade value

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

No because Betts is Old and had a bad knee injury.. Our best bet for good picks is trading 47.

You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

I prefer Clausen over Bradford

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

Cc is a 2 time PB player so yea I think ee could get picks for him. As far as Bradford goes, he is still projected as the number 1 qb, so it wouldn't be so dumb to draft him . You can have jc who has a horrible record

[DBUCHANON101]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

If NE can get a 1st for Seymour we can get at least a 2nd for Cooley. There will be a team that drafts Bradford/McCoy/Clausen and they will look for a reliable target for him to grow with. ala Falcons.