![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
I've never seen Clausen in person, but people who have seen him have told me there's no way he's over 6' feet tall (others who have seen him say he's 6'1-6'2") so if he measures at that, that may may hurt him.
Personally, I can't see him falling out of the top 10
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#62 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SF, Bay Area
Posts: 392
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
According to Mel Kiper Clausen is now rated above Sam Bradford. In his latest mock draft he has Clausen going to the Skins.
Mel Kiper: Jimmy Clausen jumps inside the top 5 in the pre-combine mock - ESPN |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Any Terps fans here have thoughts on Bruce Campbell?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Originally Portsmouth, VA but now Ocala, FL
Posts: 207
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
I know exactly what you mean, the only thing I can think of is when draft analysts start listening to other draft analysts, and think "Oh yeah thats a good point about (Whoever)." They also have nothing else to do but review tape after tape, so they're probably re-watching Sam Bradford's game against whomever for the 10th time going you know, he looks better than (so and so). Also when ever these draft analysts allow people to send them questions on the internet and they say a certain name a lot of times, the analysts go back and say "hey maybe he is a little better than I thought he was." They also look at prospects and say "well I see this guy as a decent guy with potential, but I could also see an owner like Al Davis or Jerry Jones jumping up to get this guy."
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 752
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
http://dcprosportsreport.com/articles/washington-redskins/98-mega-mock-munch-suh-solid-at-no-1-mccoy-at-no-2.html
Newest much released today. Bradford is the biggest gainer of the week in the Top 9, jumping 12% to 49% of mocks projecting him to the Redskins.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Mock drafts still won't be very meaningful for several weeks, if then.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
I heard an interview with Bradford on NFL radio yesterday and he sounds like a good kid. Smart, good work ethic, sounds like he knows what it's going to take to make it at the next level.
Question for the college gurus, if his shoulder wasn't a concern, how would that change your opinion of him? |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Quote:
, but for me his shoulder isn't a major concern in my eval of him. I'm more concerned that he was in the spread, making a high percentage of under 10yd throws, playing for a team that talent wise was pretty much head and shoulders above its competition, and throwing to wide open WRs with 7-8 seconds to throw.....plus QBs from Bob Stoops system have not fared well in the NFL.None of those issues are a knock on him, just a product of the team/offensive system. I think to get a more accurate eval of him you need to look at the championship with UF and you see some good/some bad. I don't think he's going to be a bust, but I don't think he projects to an elite QB in the NFL. His transition will likely take a bit longer than Clausen. I wouldn't spend the #4 overall pick on him. If Clausen's gone, then I go LT.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
We need some new faces on the line period. This Clausen/Bradford debate is sort of moot in my mind. Both are great QBs, but Clausen didn't make a bowl, and Bradford didn't either(Jones played). Bradford if healthy, would be the choice for me if forced to choose between the two, but I don't want either to be honest. Bradford is hot, but he played on a hot team against inferior competition most Saturdays. That in itself means squat, but in the NFL, with the exception of half a dozen teams, mediocrity rules the day. Will Bradford still excel when the "odds are even"? Face it, we are the basement of our division. Can Sam still excel when the odds are even or against him? Most of all though, we need at least our first two picks to be linemen if our future QB is even going to have half a chance of making it in the NFL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Quote:
My big thing is could he still excel when he will no longer have th e advantage of having a stacked team playing opponents of markedly inferior quality for a 16 game schedule? The shoulder thing concerns me of course, but my biggest concern is can the kid handle it when the odds are even most Sundays? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 93 MEGA Mock Munch: Suh Consensus choice, Bradford leads to Redskins
Both my and Slingin Sammies question is why I say go for Dan Levefour, Stull, Pike, Kafka, Canfield, Elliot, Sheehan, or even Elliot from Purdue. The guys you really should look for are the guys that were in a system most like Shanny's and always played competition that was about the same or even better than the QB's team. I really hope we get one of the above mentioned guys. They had good stats and didn't come from any big powerhouse teams, so they could better handle getting "roughed up".
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|