The Supreme Court and guns

[saden1]

A poor imitation is not the real thing. Brother Huey P. Newton said it best:

The Black Panthers were never a group of angry young militants full of fury toward the "white establishment." The Party operated on love for black people, not hatred of white people.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by saden1

A poor imitation is not the real thing. Brother Huey P. Newton said it best:

Poor schmuck.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

Poor schmuck.

Ain't nothing poor about me, I'm loaded fool...come get some.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

A poor imitation is not the real thing. Brother Huey P. Newton said it best:

While its not the real thing the hate they spew is real and the Obama administration found nothing wrong with them blocking voting booths while welding a club.

John Fund: Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case Dropped - WSJ.com

I guess they only care about racist when they are white.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by firstdown

While its not the real thing the hate they spew is real and the Obama administration found nothing wrong with them blocking voting booths while welding a club.

John Fund: Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case Dropped - WSJ.com

I guess they only care about racist when they are white.

LOL...the question is would the justice department be able to get a conviction if they prosecute them? I don't think so, especially when it's just two guys.

I suppose the whole story makes for good tv and good read in consevative circles.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by saden1

LOL...the question is would the justice department be able to get a conviction if they prosecute them? I don't think so, especially when it's just two guys.

I suppose the whole story makes for good tv and good read in consevative circles.

Advocating racially motivated murder of children is right in your mind? I always knew you were effed up! In VA that's called fighting words. It is in our law. It's the same as going into a movie theatre and yelling fire. That isn't free speech, it's incitment. That's why those agent provacateurs were there, to stir up violence.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

Advocating racially motivated murder of children is right in your mind? I always knew you were effed up! In VA that's called fighting words. It is in our law. It's the same as going into a movie theatre and yelling fire. That isn't free speech, it's incitment. That's why those agent provacateurs were there, to stir up violence.

You're ranting and you don't make sense. Relax and tells what you're talking about in a cool and calm manner.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by saden1

You're ranting and you don't make sense. Relax and tells what you're talking about in a cool and calm manner.

It is your responsibility to be informed. Watch the video on the link I provided. Where do you go to get information anyway, one of the gov controlled alphabet stations? So you didn't hear about the "New" Black Panters in front of the voting station screaming about, "we're gonna have to kill cracker babies"? Let me ask you something. If two Neo-Nazis armed with baseball bats, went down to a Jewish voting center, and started saying, "We can't wait until we can start killing Jews again, We got to kill us some Jews!" Would you consider that voter intimidation?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

It is your responsibility to be informed. Watch the video on the link I provided. Where do you go to get information anyway, one of the gov controlled alphabet stations? So you didn't hear about the "New" Black Panters in front of the voting station screaming about, "we're gonna have to kill cracker babies"? Let me ask you something. If two Neo-Nazis armed with baseball bats, went down to a Jewish voting center, and started saying, "We can't wait until we can start killing Jews again, We got to kill us some Jews!" Would you consider that voter intimidation?

He can't help not hearing about it...his news sources would rather have a panel discussion about Mel Gibson than the Obama DOJ's ignoring of the black version of the KKK threatening murder of white babies and letting charges of voter intimidation hide in the back of the filing cabinet.

The way the Administration is handling...actually NOT handling the Black Panthers is going to have some gigantic ramifications in the upcoming elections. I do predict the BPs to be allowed to be out and about on Election Day again though. By the President's own words, he's in agreement with the Black Panthers on issues such as reparations. Scary. Of course, some of us knew this before he was elected, but the ignorant masses either disregarded it as "hate speech" and attacks...or never bothered to find out.

In today's REAL news, the NAACP is condemning the Tea Party movement for racism...while they say nothing about the Black Panthers. I anticipate some statements and possible actions against the nonexistent racism in the Tea Parties. Breitbart offered a giant cash reward for video footage of some real racism at an event...many months ago...still nothing.

Playing the race card and throwing around baseless claims of racism does nothing else but minimize the scrutiny against REAL examples of racism. Boy who cried wolf-type effect.

It's shocking how little attention some people are paying...if you have not learned that you can't trust the mainstream media, you're incredibly naive.




As NAACP aims to stay in national debate, charge of tea party racism draws fire

Breitbart.tv » Democrat Congressman ‘Unaware’ of the New Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

LOL...the question is would the justice department be able to get a conviction if they prosecute them? I don't think so, especially when it's just two guys.

I suppose the whole story makes for good tv and good read in consevative circles.

Just two guys dressed in military outfits welding night sticks with tons of video of this is really a tough case. I forgot we are talking Obama and every thing is tough for them.

[Slingin Sammy 33]

Originally Posted by saden1

LOL...the question is would the justice department be able to get a conviction if they prosecute them? I don't think so, especially when it's just two guys.

I suppose the whole story makes for good tv and good read in consevative circles.

DoJ had a conviction.

FOXNews.com - Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case

From the article: "The Bush Justice Department brought the first case against three members of the group, accusing them in a civil complaint of violating the Voter Rights Act. The Obama administration initially pursued the case, winning a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members did not appear in court. But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a "deadly weapon" near a polling place until 2012."

A Very Obama Scandal - WSJ.com

Bartle Bull (lifelong Democrat and former civil rights lawyer) saw this first-hand and described the incident as: "the most blatant form of voter intimidation I've ever seen."

The Obama Admin. was absolutely wrong to drop this case.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33

DoJ had a conviction.

FOXNews.com - Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case

From the article: "The Bush Justice Department brought the first case against three members of the group, accusing them in a civil complaint of violating the Voter Rights Act. The Obama administration initially pursued the case, winning a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members did not appear in court. But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a "deadly weapon" near a polling place until 2012."

A Very Obama Scandal - WSJ.com

Bartle Bull (lifelong Democrat and former civil rights lawyer) saw this first-hand and described the incident as: "the most blatant form of voter intimidation I've ever seen."

The Obama Admin. was absolutely wrong to drop this case.

Default Judgment sounds nice but means nothing and it certainly isn't a "conviction"...it can be easily vacated in criminal matters. I know all about Adams and is cohorts. Do you?

Read the Schlozman Report released by the DOJ in 2008.

[Slingin Sammy 33]

Originally Posted by saden1

Default Judgment sounds nice but means nothing and it certainly isn't a "conviction"...it can be easily vacated in criminal matters. I know all about Adams and is cohorts. Do you?

Read the Schlozman Report released by the DOJ in 2008.

The political hiring issue and Adams' politcal leanings do not have an affect on the merits of the case and the fact that there was a conviction. What the NBBP members were doing was blantantly wrong, the NBBP member with the night-stick has been caught on video advocating violence against whites, and what's not on the video are the threats he made against polling workers.

Again from Bartle Bull's affidavit; "I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters." He also said they tried to "interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically," noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said "you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

www.usccr.gov/NBPH/05-14-2010_NBPPhearing.pdf

I would suggest you read page 5 of the linked document:

"A black poll worker who happened to be working for the Republican Party was called a race traitor and promised that there would be hell to pay if he emerged from the polling place, according to eyewitness statements. He was so alarmed by the Panthers' presence that he would not leave the polling

place until they left."

Open and shut.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33

The political hiring issue and Adams' politcal leanings do not have an affect on the merits of the case and the fact that there was a conviction. What the NBBP members were doing was blantantly wrong, the NBBP member with the night-stick has been caught on video advocating violence against whites, and what's not on the video are the threats he made against polling workers.

Again from Bartle Bull's affidavit; "I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters." He also said they tried to "interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically," noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said "you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

www.usccr.gov/NBPH/05-14-2010_NBPPhearing.pdf

I would suggest you read page 5 of the linked document:

"A black poll worker who happened to be working for the Republican Party was called a race traitor and promised that there would be hell to pay if he emerged from the polling place, according to eyewitness statements. He was so alarmed by the Panthers' presence that he would not leave the polling

place until they left."

Open and shut.

Nice