Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Cap Question

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2005, 11:08 PM   #1
CrazyCanuck
Serenity Now
 
CrazyCanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
Re: Cap Question

By the way, I think I understand how Brunell's restructure works.

He gives back $1M in 2005. In exchange we give him $1M in ULTBE (unlikely to be earned) incentives. We can't give him LTBE (likely to be earned) incentives because these would count against the 2005 cap.

But for Brunell to accept ULTBE doesn't make sense. Like the name says, these incentives are "unlikely to be earned", so there's a good chance he won't see his money. To counter this the Skins give him a bunch of ULTBE incentives (8 I think). So each incentive individually is ULTBE, but because there are 8 of them, the odds are good that at least one will hit. When it does hit Brunell gets his $1M back and it counts against our 2006 cap.

I'm not positive this is how it works, but if so it's another interesting way the Skins have found to get around the cap.

As for Brunell, I think it's a classy move. Granted he probably isn't giving back any money, but he does stand to lose one year of interest on $1M, plus there's a small chance that he might not see that $1M at all. Not that it comes close to making up for his play this year, but it's a start.
CrazyCanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.10328 seconds with 11 queries