Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Sources: Revis and Jets Agree on a deal

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2010, 03:46 AM   #1
gafinfan
Camp Scrub
 
gafinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 60
Re: Sources: Revis and Jets Agree on a deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
In seeing the final contract I'm starting to think that Jets management is to blame for this mess. Some reports point to a difference in guaranteed money to be as minute as $5 million. Honestly $11.5 million per year is a little high for a corner but it's not that much more then Revis was worth. Then again part of me suspects that Revis just didn't want to go to camp. This deal is way off of the rumored 10 year $160 million deal that Revis was asking for.
Agree, the numbers that were thrown around by both sides for a 10 year deal were/are a joke. 160 mil by his side and no more than 120 by the owner's side. Revis would have been a fool to sign such a deal to tie himself up for 10 years.

BTW have you seen the Dick's Revis ad where at the end when Revis ask the kid his name and he replys "Ginn." "Priceless!"
gafinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 04:13 AM   #2
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Sources: Revis and Jets Agree on a deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by gafinfan View Post
Agree, the numbers that were thrown around by both sides for a 10 year deal were/are a joke. 160 mil by his side and no more than 120 by the owner's side. Revis would have been a fool to sign such a deal to tie himself up for 10 years.

BTW have you seen the Dick's Revis ad where at the end when Revis ask the kid his name and he replys "Ginn." "Priceless!"
Niceeeeeeeeee!!!!
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 06:15 AM   #3
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Sources: Revis and Jets Agree on a deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by gafinfan View Post
Agree, the numbers that were thrown around by both sides for a 10 year deal were/are a joke. 160 mil by his side and no more than 120 by the owner's side. Revis would have been a fool to sign such a deal to tie himself up for 10 years.

BTW have you seen the Dick's Revis ad where at the end when Revis ask the kid his name and he replys "Ginn." "Priceless!"
Pretty sure he says Gilligan, not Ginn
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 06:37 AM   #4
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Sources: Revis and Jets Agree on a deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Pretty sure he says Gilligan, not Ginn
It's a joke. Ted Ginn Jr is the only one to escape from Revis island. Why do I have the feeling that you're playing dumb on this one?
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.01188 seconds with 11 queries