Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Our Current status at the WR position

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2011, 02:26 PM   #1
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Our Current status at the WR position

If you bring a deep threat to complement Moss, I think he can have the same success that Welker had when R. Moss went to NE.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 02:31 PM   #2
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: Our Current status at the WR position

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
If you bring a deep threat to complement Moss, I think he can have the same success that Welker had when R. Moss went to NE.
Armstrong was our deep threat. He averaged almost 20 yards per reception. Fred Davis had a higher per catch average than Moss. Moss was our possession receiver this year.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 02:39 PM   #3
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Our Current status at the WR position

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Armstrong was our deep threat. He averaged almost 20 yards per reception. Fred Davis had a higher per catch average than Moss. Moss was our possession receiver this year.
I was thinking a R. Moss type of deep threat. Right now, I think teams focus on shutting down Santana.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 02:42 PM   #4
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Our Current status at the WR position

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I was thinking a R. Moss type of deep threat. Right now, I think teams focus on shutting down Santana.
Randy Moss could be characterized as freakish #1 talent who's more than just a deep threat. But I think what you're trying to say is that we grab a WR who can catch those "lob it up" passes, draw a double team almost all the time, and be physical.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 02:43 PM   #5
Zerohero
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
Re: Our Current status at the WR position

The wr position was the least of my concerns this year. We have a great veteran speedster, promising young deep threat and two great tight ends.
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.80228 seconds with 11 queries