![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: What QB Do You Want at #10? | |||
Jake Locker |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
44 | 34.38% |
Ryan Mallett |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 14.06% |
Cam Newton |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 17.97% |
Other (who?) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.84% |
Blaine Gabbert |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 18.75% |
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: IF We Take A QB At #10...Who Do You Want?
The toughest obsticle for a late-round prospect to overcome is a lack of height. I don't think being short is a deal breaker if you go high and you find a coaching staff and organization that believes in you: Brees' 67% completion mark with NO proves that you can create a system that shorter players who are accurate can excel in. But you don't have that advantage if you are short and have to come in and take your lumps backing up in a pro-style offense behind a more traditional quarterback.
So in the later rounds, I look for taller players who have quick releases and can project well. In the earlier rounds, I want the entire package with very few flaws.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: IF We Take A QB At #10...Who Do You Want?
Quote:
Why is that? Professional evaluators f this transition up at an astronomical rate. Me thinks the evaluation PACKAGE for half of these talent projecting clowns is terribly flawed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: IF We Take A QB At #10...Who Do You Want?
Quote:
Some guys who are drafted high were just poor college players (Ryan Leaf, David Carr, Matt Stafford). QB Demand usually exceeds the number of quality prospects. That's the other reason. There are good prospects in this draft. I just feel like of the 3 or 4 first rounders, you're really going to take 1 or 2 who deserve to go that high, and 2 others who just don't measure up because teams NEED someone who can be the face of their organization and can't wait. Which is to say, there are better players later on in the draft, but those players aren't always distinguishable from each other (and I think teams know this), and so teams with needs shrink the supply to just 3 or 4 guys, and don't give anyone else a chance. I could say "Cam Newton's body of work says third-fourth round pick", and I'd probably be right. But you take one look at Cam Newton, and you KNOW he's going in the first round. Some team will fall in love with him. He brings tangible skills that you can't get later. That's why a draft is usually only going to produce 1, maybe 2 guys who get second contracts with their teams.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|