Offseason Shopping

dmek25 · 01-31-2011, 02:14 PM

how can anyone take this thread seriously when it starts out with bring back Bailey? he left because he didnt want to be here. and is definitely on the down side of his career

wilsowilso · 01-31-2011, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmek25

how can anyone take this thread seriously when it starts out with bring back Bailey? he left because he didnt want to be here. and is definitely on the down side of his career

The fanbase was subjected to such extreme clownish and idiotic behavior from Redskins management for such an extended period of time that invariably many smart and loyal fans became stupefied without even knowing it.

Son Of Man · 01-31-2011, 02:56 PM

I'd take Champ Bailey back...at the right price. I think the comparison to him and Charles Woodson is plausible. Would be an upgrade over Los and might cost virtually the same.

diehardskin2982 · 01-31-2011, 03:45 PM

Dmek, he was traded because the management chose to pay Lavar Arrington over Bailey. If we would have paid him top dollar he would of stayed here. He didn't leave because of free will, he was traded.

I think you are undervaluing talent if you think he has slipped that far.

JoeRedskin · 01-31-2011, 04:04 PM

^^ I think he wanted out and, unless we payed him double his free market value, he was not coming back. Yeah, we traded him but only 'cause if we didn't we going to get nothing for him.

backrow · 01-31-2011, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Son Of Man

I'd take Champ Bailey back...at the right price. I think the comparison to him and Charles Woodson is plausible. Would be an upgrade over Los and might cost virtually the same.

Can we trade CP and get both Champ and a 2nd rounder?

Monkeydad · 01-31-2011, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by backrow

Can we trade CP and get both Champ and a 2nd rounder?

Not a bad idea...really.

The Goat · 02-01-2011, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

I keep on hearing how Al Davis is smitten with the prospect of adding Young to the Raidahs. Personally he seems like he'd be a great fit in Minnesota especially if they work in a lot of bootleg play action. That same strategy allowed Dunn and Ducket to run wild while Vick was in Atlanta despite the fact that Vick was a terrible passer at the time. Giving Peterson more room to run can only be a good thing, at least from Minnesota's perspective.

And then maybe...just maybe, we can have JC back as our starter

SirClintonPortis · 02-01-2011, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

And then maybe...just maybe, we can have JC back as our starter

Not happening. What Shanahan says about personnel is law. He is the team president. (snickers at the one fool on this board who thinks Shanahan takes a laissez-faire attitude towards snatching his guys)

SkinzWin · 02-01-2011, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Not happening. What Shanahan says about personnel is law. He is the team president. (snickers at the one fool on this board who thinks Shanahan takes a laissez-faire attitude towards snatching his guys)

Nice tie in to economic principles! I wonder if they have a Shanny 10 Drafting Commandments in his office or the war room during the draft.

MonkFan4Life · 02-01-2011, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

Dmek, he was traded because the management chose to pay Lavar Arrington over Bailey. If we would have paid him top dollar he would of stayed here. He didn't leave because of free will, he was traded.

I think you are undervaluing talent if you think he has slipped that far.

He was traded because when Joe Gibbs got here he asked who all wanted to go. Champ said that he'd rather leave because he got tired of the changes. He could've gotten his money here, but he was ready to leave which worked out because this team needed a running back at the time. So believe me it was because of free will, the team just gave him what he wanted and that was a change of scenery.

sportscurmudgeon · 02-01-2011, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

Champ Bailey back in DC anybody? New regiem maybe posible... I think he'll be cheaper than Namdi and would complement the core group if we can't resign Carlos.

Possible - - but highly unlikely. Bailey's exit from Washington was "less than cordial" on both sides of the table.

Indeed, he will be "cheaper than Nnamdi"; but I think he will be elsewhere...

SkinzWin · 02-01-2011, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon

Possible - - but highly unlikely. Bailey's exit from Washington was "less than cordial" on both sides of the table.

Indeed, he will be "cheaper than Nnamdi"; but I think he will be elsewhere...

I think it also depends on how much of a need the Skins have for him. If they get Los and D Hall back next year they won't need him that badly. IF Los walks and they need another CB, maybe they pursue him a little harder and offer him a nice deal he would be less likely to pass up?!

skinsfaninok · 02-01-2011, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon

Possible - - but highly unlikely. Bailey's exit from Washington was "less than cordial" on both sides of the table.

Indeed, he will be "cheaper than Nnamdi"; but I think he will be elsewhere...

I hated the day we traded CHAMP

44ever · 02-01-2011, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

I hated the day we traded CHAMP

Only the Redskins...

01-31-2011, 02:14 PM	#31
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Offseason Shopping how can anyone take this thread seriously when it starts out with bring back Bailey? he left because he didnt want to be here. and is definitely on the down side of his career __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

01-31-2011, 02:56 PM	#33
Son Of Man Impact Rookie Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ellicott City, MD Posts: 643	Re: Offseason Shopping I'd take Champ Bailey back...at the right price. I think the comparison to him and Charles Woodson is plausible. Would be an upgrade over Los and might cost virtually the same. __________________ RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!!

01-31-2011, 03:45 PM	#34
diehardskin2982 Another Year, another mess. Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,581	Re: Offseason Shopping Dmek, he was traded because the management chose to pay Lavar Arrington over Bailey. If we would have paid him top dollar he would of stayed here. He didn't leave because of free will, he was traded. I think you are undervaluing talent if you think he has slipped that far. __________________ That got ugly fast

01-31-2011, 04:04 PM	#35
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 62 Posts: 10,401	Re: Offseason Shopping ^^ I think he wanted out and, unless we payed him double his free market value, he was not coming back. Yeah, we traded him but only 'cause if we didn't we going to get nothing for him. __________________ Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.

Offseason Shopping

Locker Room Main Forum