![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
I think the idea that we could trade up for Andrew Luck just needs to be forgotten right now. If a team is bad enough this coming year to earn the #1 overall pick (the pick it will take to get Andrew Luck) then that team is quite likely to need an answer at QB.
There's no way anybody trades out of that spot. It's just like Bradford with the Rams last year, they had offers on the table, but they saw him there and turned them all down. The only way we get Andrew Luck next year is if we're the worst team in the NFL. That just won't happen.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Quote:
Why won't it? We're still the worst team in our division and we're only better than a few teams. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Quote:
Either way though, my point stands. If we suck bad enough to get the 1st overall pick then we get Andrew Luck regardless and no trade is needed. If we suck only bad enough to get the 2nd pick (or any other pick) there's no way the team with the 1st will trade out of it. Either way, trading up for Andrew Luck will not happen.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Just watched the Draft segment on SC with McShay. Here's what he's hearing.
-Newton will be the first pick in Carolina. Not confirmed yet but it seems like they're heading in that direction. - Gabbert could go to Buffalo and Cincy but believes they'll both pass which results in him falling to Arizona -Tennessee OC Chris Palmer (of David Carr in Houston fame) really likes Jake Locker and they might look to be one of St. Louis trade partners and trade back to 14. The thing is if they do decide to take Locker that they're worried about Washington at 10 and Minnesota at 12. So basically right now Locker is expected to go anywhere from 8 to 14. - Dalton and Ponder have a chance to go in the first round but he believes without trades Ponder would go to Buffalo at 34 and Dalton would go to Cincy at 35. So if McShay is right then here's what I see if we decide we want to come away with a QB in the first two rounds. 1. Either "reach" for someone at 10. The most likely candidate would be Locker. 2. Trade back and reach for Dalton or Ponder. Or if they like Locker see if he falls to where they trade back. 2a. Trade back, take someone like Kerrigan and use the extra pick gained in the trade back to trade up from 41. 3. Trade up using next years picks from 41 above Buffalo, Cincy, and Seattle to secure Dalton or Ponder. 4. Wait for one of the projects to fall in Kaepernick or Mallet at 41 or hope that Ponder experiences a Colt McCoy like dive.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,178
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Mallett won't last until 41, as for the 10th pick I want a QB. The NFL has changed , this isn't always draft OL or DL anymore. QB is more important now than ever especially with the latest rule changes, the redskins havnt had a young QB of the future in decades So yes we need to take one now
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 1,092
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
I tend to agree, Mallet is the most plug and play ready out of all the QB's in this draft as long as you can protect him.
__________________
doing it all in the spirit of the salary cap! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Would you be ok with...
I remember the Sugar Bowl.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|