8th Circuit Court Grants Stay, Lockout Continues

CRedskinsRule · 05-17-2011, 10:13 PM

2 points-
Legally, the players didn't de-certify they filed a disclaimer of the union. The difference is that a disclaimer can be rescinded any time, a de-certification is in place for a year. Thus, a disclaimer is much more a light switch the nflpa can turn on or off as needed.

So far the disclaimer is not illegal, or a sham, however - I think it violates the spirit of the 2006 CBA terms on its expiration. The NLRB may at some point rule the disclaimer invalid.

05-17-2011, 10:13 PM	#11
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 58 Posts: 21,699	2 points- Legally, the players didn't de-certify they filed a disclaimer of the union. The difference is that a disclaimer can be rescinded any time, a de-certification is in place for a year. Thus, a disclaimer is much more a light switch the nflpa can turn on or off as needed. So far the disclaimer is not illegal, or a sham, however - I think it violates the spirit of the 2006 CBA terms on its expiration. The NLRB may at some point rule the disclaimer invalid.

8th Circuit Court Grants Stay, Lockout Continues

Locker Room Main Forum