![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 5,813
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
To this? I say suck a meat-sack ESPN.
Pirates MARLINS ROYALS CLIPPERS JUST .... to name a few off the top of my head and I don't feel like typing the 20 more or so in that are out there worse off then we are. Go suck off Tony romo and stop writing shit.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
If I use "bang for the buck, players, fan relations, affordability, stadium experience, ownership, title track, and coaching" to measure the Redskins I would be hard pressed not to place them at the bottom of the pile.
Don't fool yourselves die-hard Skins fans...they stink in pretty much all those areas.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
Quote:
To me if the team is doing well financially and still can fill their seats even with the piss poor management and piss poor coaching then they should clearly close to the top of the list. Worse teams..... Jaguars- not filling their stadium, losing money, wanting to move all screams bad franchise. Bills- losing money, wanting to play in Canada of all places screams of a worse franchise then the Skins. Raiders- moving every 5-10 yrs, firing HC's every other year, players leaving, stadium not filled screams of bad franchise. There probably is other NFL teams I could list before even getting to other sports so whoever came up with the list is an idiot. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
Quote:
You confuse "financially successful franchise" with "good franchise". This poll looked at "good" and "bad" from a fan perspective and not from a CPA's perspective. In addition, if you look at the Redskins, they NEVER fill FedEx Field and NEVER have; they do NOT have a waiting list for season tix; they have had 7 different head coaches in the 11 years that Danny Boy has owned the team. With regard to Buffalo and your assertion of its lack of success, can you ever recall a home game in Buffalo where the Steelers' fans outnumbered the Bills' fans? Even in December when the Bills were mathematically eliminated? Happened here... on MNF no less. Players leave the Raiders because Al Davis no longer recognizes who he needs to pay to stay there. Players do not leave the Redskins because they are already overpaid here and they know they will take pay cuts to go elsewhere. The Redskins should NOT be the 121st team on this list; they are better than that. But pretending that this is and has been a well-run franchise from a football perspective or from a fan perspective for the last 15 years is living in a delusion.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
I don't normally agree with sportscurmudgeon, but when I do...it's now #themostinterestingmodintheworld
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: ESPN the Magazine ranks the best & worst franchises in america. Redskins ranked 121 out of 122.
Quote:
I mean who really cares if we're 121st or 81st? The past 15+ years has overall been just miserable for the Skins in many different facets. Downright embarrassing really. There's no denying that. So what do all you people want? You really want to get worked up because some people think we suck a little bit more than we actually do? At the end of the day we still suck. Getting upset over this list is a waste of time.
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|