Redskins Receivers Rotation

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by diehard

Fred Davis should be working with the WRs. Cooley, Paulsen, and Sellers can handle playing TEs.

Que?

[12thMan]

Just saw on twitter if the Niles Paul ends up on the PS, there's little chance that he'd stay unclaimed.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Just saw on twitter if the Niles Paul ends up on the PS, there's little chance that he'd stay unclaimed.

Yeah, kinda depends on what he flashes during the preseason

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I just don't understand why they draft guys and then bring in older guys. If you have little or no intention of playing them then draft some freakin' o-linemen in the later rounds. This team is seriously obsessed with wr's. lol.

But then we'd have to cut the veteran OL

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Just saw on twitter if the Niles Paul ends up on the PS, there's little chance that he'd stay unclaimed.

Hopefully that means he earns the #5 job. The dudes gonna be our offensive rookie of the year.

[Kindoy]

Assuming we keep 6... Moss, Gaffney, Armstrong, Hankerson, Austin & Banks is what's floating my boat right now.

[skins89moss]

WR who make 53 man roster.
1.Moss
2.Gaffney
3.Armstrong
4.Hankerson
5.Austin (SP)
6.Paul (SP)
7.Banks (KR/PR) if not put on IR

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by skins89moss

WR who make 53 man roster.
1.Moss
2.Gaffney
3.Armstrong
4.Hankerson
5.Austin (SP)
6.Paul (SP)
7.Banks (KR/PR) if not put on IR

No way we'd carry 7 Wrs and no way hankerson is higher than Austin

[wilsowilso]

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Paul/Banks

Austin needs to be on the field as much as possible this year. That guy has top 2 potential not too far down the line.

[MTK]

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

[mlmpetert]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

Im gonna switch out Banks with Stallworth and drop Hankerson down a notch. A injured Banks doesnt play special teams either. Unless Banks plays and doesnt swell up after the game next week i think he starts the year on the PUP list

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.

If Banks is healthy he's too valuable in the return game. Austin is a nice backup as a returner, but Banks is still the big play guy. Austin doesn't match him in that regard.

Paul hasn't shown us much in the passing game. John Keim has remarked that his route running at this point is still really a work in progress.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by mlmpetert

Im gonna switch out Banks with Stallworth and drop Hankerson down a notch. A injured Banks doesnt play special teams either. Unless Banks plays and doesnt swell up after the game next week i think he starts the year on the PUP list

He can't start on PUP. He would have needed to be on there at the start of camp.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

This makes the most sense at this point assuming Banks is healthy