NFL says players can wear red, white and blue on 9/11

[dmek25]

the league can mandate players wearing pink for breast cancer, but not for this? please....

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by dmek25

the league can mandate players wearing pink for breast cancer, but not for this? please....

Might as well mandate something for Pearl Harbor, Vietnam, War War II, Korean War, Iraq War I & II.


Breast cancer is a ongoing battle, and claims more lives a year than 9/11 did. That's just one year. Don't compare the two please. I know you guys are all emotional about this, but think.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Might as well mandate something for Pearl Harbor, Vietnam, War War II, Korean War, Iraq War I & II.


Breast cancer is a ongoing battle, and claims more lives a year than 9/11 did. That's just one year. Don't compare the two please. I know you guys are all emotional about this, but think.

i think the reason that we take this seriously, is because of how recent it happened, and how football played a part in getting the entire society back on the track of "normal" when it happened. to compare it to wars and battles is ridiculous when this was basically an attack on our views and ideologies, and on us as an entire nation, all while being done right in the countries biggest city, visible to all. very different.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

this was basically an attack on our views and ideologies, and on us as an entire nation. very different.

Wrong. Try foreign policy.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Wrong. Try foreign policy.

You sure about that? How do you explain the many other attacks Islamic extremists commited such as the Luxor Massacre (Primarily Swiss victims), The Qahantaniya bombings (Yazidi victims) etc, The Jordan Wedding Massacre (Jordanian Moslems). Was it their foreign policy?

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Wrong. Try foreign policy.

I have al Qaeda's stated goal as follows: 'establishment of a pan-Islamic Caliphate throughout the world'.

I suppose if protecting ourselves from that is a Foriegn Policy faux pas then, yeah, we're 'just asking for trouble'.....

<rolls_eyes>

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

I have al Qaeda's stated goal as follows: 'establishment of a pan-Islamic Caliphate throughout the world'.

I suppose if protecting ourselves from that is a Foriegn Policy faux pas then, yeah, we're 'just asking for trouble'.....

<rolls_eyes>

If you want to talk about this, start a thread in the Off Topic forums and I'll discuss it, not going to in the football forums. That said, your link shows nothing.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

I have al Qaeda's stated goal as follows: 'establishment of a pan-Islamic Caliphate throughout the world'.

I suppose if protecting ourselves from that is a Foriegn Policy faux pas then, yeah, we're 'just asking for trouble'.....

<rolls_eyes>

You make a good point, as does nonniey above. Obviously it is mistaken to argue, as others have done, that the al Qaeda problem is ONLY a result of US foreign policy. That is overly simplistic.

That said, there are reasons why al Qaeda is so fixated on attacking the USA rather than other "unIslamic" states such as, say for example, Uruguay. We have made foreign policy errors in the Muslim world going all the way back at least to the orchestrated overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran in 1953.

It is not just that we stand in the way of al Qaeda's unrealistic dream of a pan-Islamic empire because we are so powerful. We also have made some mistakes.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by dmek25

the league can mandate players wearing pink for breast cancer, but not for this? please....

exactly