Unit Analysis: Running Backs

[Redskins8588]

My problem with this analysis is how do we get ranked a B when we have 2 good RB's and Dallas gets a B+ with a 2nd year RB that missed half of last season, also how do the Giants get a B+ when the analysis even says that there backup situation is "muddled" the Giants do not have a good back up, yet they are ranked a B+....

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

My problem with this analysis is how do we get ranked a B when we have 2 good RB's and Dallas gets a B+ with a 2nd year RB that missed half of last season, also how do the Giants get a B+ when the analysis even says that there backup situation is "muddled" the Giants do not have a good back up, yet they are ranked a B+....

I had the same thoughts. If they were basing it on last season the lack of TD's maybe the reason for a B-.This year will be a diffrent story.

[PSUskinsfan11]

We should at least have a B+. Portis is a top 5 RB, Betts could start for some teams, and the young guys ,White and Broughton (esp. Broughton), are going to be great short yardage backs with hands.

[jacobyfan]

No one is going to give us credit for jack until we start putting up points and winning games. Just the way it is.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by jacobyfan

No one is going to give us credit for jack until we start putting up points and winning games. Just the way it is.

Exactly.

[monk81]

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

My problem with this analysis is how do we get ranked a B when we have 2 good RB's and Dallas gets a B+ with a 2nd year RB that missed half of last season, also how do the Giants get a B+ when the analysis even says that there backup situation is "muddled" the Giants do not have a good back up, yet they are ranked a B+....

The Giants are the media darlings.........and although Barber improved last year, what about his tendency to fumble.................