Unit Analysis: Running Backs

firstdown · 07-08-2005, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

My problem with this analysis is how do we get ranked a B when we have 2 good RB's and Dallas gets a B+ with a 2nd year RB that missed half of last season, also how do the Giants get a B+ when the analysis even says that there backup situation is "muddled" the Giants do not have a good back up, yet they are ranked a B+....

I had the same thoughts. If they were basing it on last season the lack of TD's maybe the reason for a B-.This year will be a diffrent story.

PSUskinsfan11 · 07-08-2005, 01:06 PM

We should at least have a B+. Portis is a top 5 RB, Betts could start for some teams, and the young guys ,White and Broughton (esp. Broughton), are going to be great short yardage backs with hands.

jacobyfan · 07-08-2005, 01:09 PM

No one is going to give us credit for jack until we start putting up points and winning games. Just the way it is.

Redskins_P · 07-08-2005, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacobyfan

No one is going to give us credit for jack until we start putting up points and winning games. Just the way it is.

Exactly.

07-08-2005, 01:06 PM	#2
PSUskinsfan11 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: the port, PA Age: 40 Posts: 692	Re: Unit Analysis: Running Backs We should at least have a B+. Portis is a top 5 RB, Betts could start for some teams, and the young guys ,White and Broughton (esp. Broughton), are going to be great short yardage backs with hands. __________________ R.I.P. ST 21.....never forgotten

07-08-2005, 01:09 PM	#3
jacobyfan Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Nashville, TN Age: 46 Posts: 172	Re: Unit Analysis: Running Backs No one is going to give us credit for jack until we start putting up points and winning games. Just the way it is.

Unit Analysis: Running Backs

Locker Room Main Forum