Why aren't we risking a 6th or 7th rounder in supp. draft?

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Why aren't we risking a 6th or 7th rounder in supp. draft?

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Why aren't we risking a 6th or 7th rounder in supp. draft?

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

07-14-2005, 10:54 PM #12

e16bball

Special Teams

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 163

Re: Why aren't we risking a 6th or 7th rounder in supp. draft?

We are going for speed, yes, but Crosby has that in spades. He ripped off a 4.37 40, which is smokin'. And he's 6'2", which gives him an advantage in the vertical game as well. Personally I would've used the 7th rounder on him.

e16bball

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by e16bball

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.30398 seconds with 11 queries

07-14-2005, 10:54 PM	#12
e16bball Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 163	Re: Why aren't we risking a 6th or 7th rounder in supp. draft? We are going for speed, yes, but Crosby has that in spades. He ripped off a 4.37 40, which is smokin'. And he's 6'2", which gives him an advantage in the vertical game as well. Personally I would've used the 7th rounder on him.