CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"

[That Guy]

hurt is depth... quality depth? debatable. but i'd probably keep him and squad compton.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by That Guy

hurt is depth... quality depth? debatable. but i'd probably keep him and squad compton.

Without getting into the advanced stats from sites like like pro football focus (which actually show that Hurt (a rookie) played about the same level as a Chris Chester (who is more expensive and totally overrated but everyone seems to love) for me I took notice that when Hurt settled ino the line-up the running game improved.

If Hurt isn't a potential starter he's at the very least quality depth.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by 30gut

Without getting into the advanced stats from sites like like pro football focus (which actually show that Hurt (a rookie) played about the same level as a Chris Chester (who is more expensive and totally overrated but everyone seems to love) for me I took notice that when Hurt settled ino the line-up the running game improved.

If Hurt isn't a potential starter he's at the very least quality depth.

how many teams would he start on? chester isn't really very good either, we just don't have a much better option, but i was asking for his replacement this offseason.

[JGisLordOfTheRings]

Originally Posted by That Guy

hurt is depth... quality depth? debatable. but i'd probably keep him and squad compton.

I'd say decent quality. He's been in the system a year and he did a damn good job as a road grater late in the season. His pass pro is horrendous though so, there's that.

I'm really hoping we found a diamond in the rough with some of this years OL picks.