Redskins vs Rams Postgame Thread

[SFREDSKIN]

The good:

RGIII
Hankerson
Morris
Fletcher
Bowen

The bad:

Haslett
Danny Smith
Officials
Morgan
Going for a 62 yd. field goal instead of letting RGIII do something

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

The good:

RGIII
Hankerson
Morris
Fletcher
Bowen

The bad:

Haslett
Danny Smith
Officials
Morgan
Going for a 62 yd. field goal instead of letting RGIII do something

I agree with you except the 62 yard field goal. I understood the thinking with that.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

I agree with you except the 62 yard field goal. I understood the thinking with that.

I think they should've let Griffin go for it. Cundiff is horrible from beyond 50, and we all know 60 is even worse than 50. They were basically saying the odds of Cundiff making a 62 yarder are better than the odds of RG3 getting the first down on 4th and 16.

[Giantone]

I know it might not mean much but I think Bob is for real,he's only gonna get better.The NFL has to do something soon about the refs,and it's across the league .Act soon before someone gets hurt!

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

The bad:


Going for a 62 yd. field goal instead of letting RGIII do something

+1. If we had gano, I'd understand the 62 yard attempt. Cundiff can't be trusted beyond 40. I was 100 percent sure he'd miss it and he did. Rg3 could possibly have done something.

I also question using our IR exemption on a long snapper. We could have used that on carriker.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

+1. If we had gano, I'd understand the 62 yard attempt. Cundiff can't be trusted beyond 40. I was 100 percent sure he'd miss it and he did. Rg3 could possibly have done something.

I also question using our IR exemption on a long snapper. We could have used that on carriker.

I 100% agree on why the hell we used the IR exemption on a LS. But as for the 'it could have been carriker' well I'm pretty sure Carrikers done for the year with a torn ACL.