Randy McMichael Might Be Available

DGreene28 · 03-05-2007, 09:54 PM

We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?

SmootSmack · 03-05-2007, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGreene28

We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?

I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691

I just sent you a PM

ArtMonkDrillz · 03-05-2007, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691

I just sent you a PM

Looks like that Love Boat avatar is already starting to pay off

(that's right, I have the sense of humor of a middle schooler, you wanna fight about it?)

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR · 03-05-2007, 10:40 PM

mcmichael would be a good back up to cooley if anything ever happen to him. but it would have to be a bargain contract or hardly any signing bonus. Need to find a guard or dlineman.

MTK · 03-05-2007, 11:30 PM

McMichael is one of the better receiving TEs in the league, no way he's even on our radar.

GTripp0012 · 03-05-2007, 11:36 PM

I always like TE depth. I feel like you can never have enough good TEs. I've just never liked McMichael. He's a subpar blocker, has character issues, and is even overrated at what he does well--catching the football.

Graham would be so much more enticing its not even funny.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 03-05-2007, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dall-assblows

1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?

i always liked salmon

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 03-05-2007, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority

add me to the like him but dont go after him club way more needs than him and he is looking to make big money i say before we sign a new tight end we should extend colley's contract

That Guy · 03-06-2007, 01:06 AM

he'd immediately be the #2 here. I think he's good, but if its over 1mill per, we've got other needs to save for.

Aussie_Skins_Fan · 03-06-2007, 05:25 AM

I doubt he would even want to be here. If he came here, he shouldn't get great money and wouldn't get a start ahead of Cooley (Who will make the Pro Bowl this year, thats my 'lead pipe lock'). So i don't think that makes a very attractive option for him, or us.

Rajmahal33 · 03-06-2007, 09:47 AM

McMichael is more of a razzle dazzle kind of player, whereas we need a garbage man. The one thing that he could provide for this team is that he would give JC a big target in the end zone on goal line sets. We currently don't have a tall receiver and McMichael was always great in the red zone at Miami. Still i agree that we shouldn't go after him unless its a real bargain. We need a blocker to seal the ends on those counter plays and such.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-06-2007, 11:03 AM

He has killed at least 3 of my fantasy teams with his late season disappearing acts.

Let someone throw 30 million at him (hopefully the Cowboys or Niners) so we can laugh.

Jamaican'Skin · 03-06-2007, 11:22 AM

Don't think he's worth our time. He's not needed, and he's not gonna get paid to block. I think the FO is making smart moves this offseason, and this will be one they shy away from

freddyg12 · 03-06-2007, 11:56 AM

would be nice, but not for the likely price
Sign Yoder & draft a TE in rnd. 6 or 7.

Monkeydad · 03-06-2007, 12:25 PM

Nope, Cooley's our man for TE pass-catching.

We need a blocking-monster for our other TE. How will Yoder do this year in that role?

03-05-2007, 09:54 PM	#16
DGreene28 Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Connecticut Posts: 335	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself? __________________ Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher

03-05-2007, 10:40 PM	#19
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: va Age: 58 Posts: 890	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available mcmichael would be a good back up to cooley if anything ever happen to him. but it would have to be a bargain contract or hardly any signing bonus. Need to find a guard or dlineman.

03-05-2007, 11:30 PM	#20
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available McMichael is one of the better receiving TEs in the league, no way he's even on our radar. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-05-2007, 11:36 PM	#21
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available I always like TE depth. I feel like you can never have enough good TEs. I've just never liked McMichael. He's a subpar blocker, has character issues, and is even overrated at what he does well--catching the football. Graham would be so much more enticing its not even funny. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

03-06-2007, 01:06 AM	#24
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available he'd immediately be the #2 here. I think he's good, but if its over 1mill per, we've got other needs to save for.

03-06-2007, 05:25 AM	#25
Aussie_Skins_Fan Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 61	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available I doubt he would even want to be here. If he came here, he shouldn't get great money and wouldn't get a start ahead of Cooley (Who will make the Pro Bowl this year, thats my 'lead pipe lock'). So i don't think that makes a very attractive option for him, or us. __________________ Even from the other side of the world, i still HAIL!

03-06-2007, 09:47 AM	#26
Rajmahal33 Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 478	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available McMichael is more of a razzle dazzle kind of player, whereas we need a garbage man. The one thing that he could provide for this team is that he would give JC a big target in the end zone on goal line sets. We currently don't have a tall receiver and McMichael was always great in the red zone at Miami. Still i agree that we shouldn't go after him unless its a real bargain. We need a blocker to seal the ends on those counter plays and such. __________________ McNasty FTW!

03-06-2007, 11:03 AM	#27
Pocket$ $traight Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 49 Posts: 4,261	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available He has killed at least 3 of my fantasy teams with his late season disappearing acts. Let someone throw 30 million at him (hopefully the Cowboys or Niners) so we can laugh.

03-06-2007, 11:22 AM	#28
Jamaican'Skin The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Kingston, Jamaica Age: 38 Posts: 2,418	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available Don't think he's worth our time. He's not needed, and he's not gonna get paid to block. I think the FO is making smart moves this offseason, and this will be one they shy away from

03-06-2007, 11:56 AM	#29
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available would be nice, but not for the likely price Sign Yoder & draft a TE in rnd. 6 or 7.

03-06-2007, 12:25 PM	#30
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available Nope, Cooley's our man for TE pass-catching. We need a blocking-monster for our other TE. How will Yoder do this year in that role?

Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Locker Room Main Forum