![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Pete Kendall To Start vs. Jags
as many people around here that thinks its easy to switch positions, I'm surprised that this wasn't brought up
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Pete Kendall To Start vs. Jags
From reading the WP article, it seems like if Kendall is in there, he'll be running pretty much Joe Bugel 1.0. So, if our ground game takes off it'll probable shed some light on what our running game is capable of.
Then again, if we look stale again... It doesn't say anything because he's just running base offense. What is it 11 days until week 1? God I'm tired of pre-season. P.S. did anyone watch the interview with Portis today? He cracks me up... I've got 25$ saying he doesn't play a snap tomorrow.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Pete Kendall To Start vs. Jags
I don't know if anyone has made this point but in my opinion Kendall is actually an upgrade from Dockery. Dockery was young but at this point in time, I would take Kendall every day of the week and twice on Sundays. He is also going to be much cheaper.
Outstanding move when we were staring a potential crisis right in the eye. We are trying to win this year and going by that gameplan, this was an absolute no brainer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Pete Kendall To Start vs. Jags
Quote:
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|