Observation on Campbell

WaldSkins · 01-02-2009, 02:51 PM

Graham Harrell would look nice in B&G

DarkKnight · 01-02-2009, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

Graham Harrell would look nice in B&G

Uh........No

Paintrain · 01-02-2009, 02:54 PM

Wow, what insight. Campbell is slow making reads, slow in his progression, slow release, less than ideal accuracy and isn't 'intense' enough. Is it possible to ban all new Campbell threads that don't put forth original thoughts?

44ever · 01-02-2009, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Wow, what insight. Campbell is slow making reads, slow in his progression, slow release, less than ideal accuracy and isn't 'intense' enough. Is it possible to ban all new Campbell threads that don't put forth original thoughts?

Here, here. I second the motion

The Goat · 01-02-2009, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Wow, what insight. Campbell is slow making reads, slow in his progression, slow release, less than ideal accuracy and isn't 'intense' enough. Is it possible to ban all new Campbell threads that don't put forth original thoughts?

Ditto.

Skinny Tee · 01-02-2009, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Wow, what insight. Campbell is slow making reads, slow in his progression, slow release, less than ideal accuracy and isn't 'intense' enough. Is it possible to ban all new Campbell threads that don't put forth original thoughts?

Here some new observations...he's tends to look frozen and seems like he's not going fast at times. His leadership lacks focus and when he throws he comes off as an old sloth.

...wait...those are old observations with new terminology...I guess this doesn't apply sorry.

JC is the 2nd or 3rd least of our problems right now. Once we solidify our line you'll be able to see who is the liability in the offense.

KLHJ2 · 01-02-2009, 03:31 PM

I think that he needs to get some better endorsement deals. GEICO and Expedia are not doing him any justice.

dmek25 · 01-02-2009, 03:51 PM

i have an idea. lets mega merge all the Campbell threads, and then lock them. whatever needs to be said, has already been said( 1000 times over)

JoeRedskin · 01-02-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmek25

i have an idea. lets mega merge all the Campbell threads, and then lock them. whatever needs to be said, has already been said( 1000 times over)

Only if we can reopen the Brunnell/Ramsey and Arrington threads. I mean, you gotta give value to get value.

WaldSkins · 01-02-2009, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Only if we can reopen the Brunnell/Ramsey and Arrington threads. I mean, you gotta give value to get value.

Who says you gotta open and read it???

davy · 01-02-2009, 04:00 PM

What else do we have to talk about?

The strange thing is, that during the four game winning streak against the Saints, Cards, Cowboys and Eagles he looked great. He was making quick decisions, going through his reads quickly and getting rid of the ball on time. He made me think I had been wrong about him and that Zorn had really turned him into a legitimate NFL QB. Sad thing is, that since that streak he has reverted to looking like the same slow-witted Campbell that so frustrated me up until that point.

He baffles me I must admit.

44ever · 01-02-2009, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davy

What else do we have to talk about?

The strange thing is, that during the four game winning streak against the Saints, Cards, Cowboys and Eagles he looked great. He was making quick decisions, going through his reads quickly and getting rid of the ball on time. He made me think I had been wrong about him and that Zorn had really turned him into a legitimate NFL QB. Sad thing is, that since that streak he has reverted to looking like the same slow-witted Campbell that so frustrated me up until that point.

He baffles me I must admit.

Davy. The way I see it is when Portis got hurt it really changed our O scheme. Not only was he throwing opposing D off with the threat of his running but was adding superior pass protection. He obviously gave JC added confidence and took the pressure off him.

After Portis injuries started we left him in the games but we were not fooling anyone. Opposing D started playing a little deeper and tighter. A weak O line was all that was needed for the decline.

Portis is the only constant. Had he stayed healthy would be talking about other things. IMO.

Nobody beats Dallas and Philly on the road and then losses to the Rams at home and the Bengals.

BigHairedAristocrat · 01-02-2009, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 44ever

Nobody beats Dallas and Philly on the road and then losses to the Rams at home and the Bengals.

have you watched the skins play? thats been the MO of this team the past few years.

44ever · 01-02-2009, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

have you watched the skins play? thats been the MO of this team the past few years.

I've been watching them for 35 years. I remember Dallas going 1-15 beating only the Redskins. So I'm well aware of our lopsided play. But the point I was trying to make is there was a definate point of decline and that point started with Portis' decline.

You're not a JC fan I get it.

WaldSkins · 01-02-2009, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 44ever

I've been watching them for 35 years. I remember Dallas going 1-15 beating only the Redskins. So I'm well aware of our lopsided play. But the point I was trying to make is there was a definate point of decline and that point started with Portis' decline.

You're not a JC fan I get it.

Portis's decline is a direct result of not having a passing game.

01-02-2009, 02:51 PM	#1
WaldSkins Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 42 Posts: 2,726	Re: Observation on Campbell Graham Harrell would look nice in B&G __________________ "I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown

01-02-2009, 02:54 PM	#3
Paintrain Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 54 Posts: 5,006	Re: Observation on Campbell Wow, what insight. Campbell is slow making reads, slow in his progression, slow release, less than ideal accuracy and isn't 'intense' enough. Is it possible to ban all new Campbell threads that don't put forth original thoughts? __________________ Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman

01-02-2009, 03:31 PM	#7
KLHJ2 Inactive Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 47 Posts: 5,829	Re: Observation on Campbell I think that he needs to get some better endorsement deals. GEICO and Expedia are not doing him any justice.

01-02-2009, 03:51 PM	#8
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Observation on Campbell i have an idea. lets mega merge all the Campbell threads, and then lock them. whatever needs to be said, has already been said( 1000 times over) __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

01-02-2009, 04:00 PM	#11
davy Impact Rookie Join Date: May 2004 Location: England Posts: 957	Re: Observation on Campbell What else do we have to talk about? The strange thing is, that during the four game winning streak against the Saints, Cards, Cowboys and Eagles he looked great. He was making quick decisions, going through his reads quickly and getting rid of the ball on time. He made me think I had been wrong about him and that Zorn had really turned him into a legitimate NFL QB. Sad thing is, that since that streak he has reverted to looking like the same slow-witted Campbell that so frustrated me up until that point. He baffles me I must admit. __________________ “Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.”

Observation on Campbell

Locker Room Main Forum