![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
... So why exactly are 2 games not a good enough sample size, statistically speaking of course?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
Quote:
It's not an adequate sample to conclude the Redskins are a 0-16 team (sample size - 2), although that is what they are on pace for. It is an adequate sample to conclude something that happens on every play. For example, the Redskins are allowed to line up with 11 players on every play, and their continued success at doing so can be confirmed through statistics. I.e. through 150 plays this year on offense, the Redskins have lined up in a legal formation 146 times (or something). We CAN conclude that the Redskins know how to line up in a legal formation (Sample size - 150), because they have to do it every play, and they're generally pretty good at it. That's a really stupid example, but my point is two games is only a large sample when we talk about events that happen on every play.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
However, if you only watched the first half of the Eagles game (sample size 25 ish), you would have been unable to conclude (statisically) that the Redskins lining up legally wasn't just due to random chance. The sample size would have been too small (and frankly, they weren't that convincing).
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
I think it's best described in the play calling. That's all that ready matters, and I do agree with you in that the offensive scheme looks much more like 2011 then anything we did in 2012.
__________________
Just win. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,097
|
Exactly. Wasnt even thinking about the browns game - but yes. We stil wanted to mix the run with the pass and keep the d guessing but we coudnt ro with cousins like we did with griff so we rolled him out alot and got him into space where he could keep the d guessing. Well now We cant ro with Griff like we did with Griff - lol so roll him out. That being said ro here and there - griff may not be 100% but he has proven he can take a hit - cant play scared with him. A viscious hit can happen to any player anytime.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,097
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Texas
Age: 35
Posts: 17
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
Would I be wrong in suggesting that the time to let Cousins play is getting closer?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
Yes.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
If you put much stock in GTripp's analysis, and I do, it sounds like the best short term fix on offense is putting the right players on the field i.e. receiving targets who best create separation from defenders. I think Tripps a little harsh on Moss because that dude has shown as much ability to get open as anyone so far, it's pretty spot on otherwise. I don't ever notice Morgan getting wide open. He doesn't have the moves. But he is a gritty runner so as long as he's on the roster Morgan should be out go to guy on screen passes. Garçon isn't consistent, just as Tripp said.
So our base offense should include garçon, hankerson, Reid and mix in Helu more to mask passing downs. But it still begs the question why we aren't seeing bootlegs and roll outs. Either way, coaching is a big issue, the biggest IMO. Why don't mike/Kyle recognize who can help RG the most by making plays? And why the reversion back to pre 2012 football? Now RG isn't even good enough for what you gave cousins to work with? C'mon.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
What I see is a QB that isn't good enough right now to run this type of offense. He needs a running game to be successful. Sorry but that scares me a little bit. We saw some of this last year... when teams knew we had to pass, we couldn't convert 3rd downs. Right now he needs to get help from the coaches, as others have said...get him on the move a bit more, spread out the field formation wise and run some quicker passes, run the no huddle...things he did well at Baylor. Not only does RG3 need to pick it up, but you too Kyle.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parkville
Posts: 464
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
I think we just need to dump the pistol and RO. It got is in this mix and isn't going to help Rob one bit. We have TE's, good receivers, and RB's. they must be the offense, not a guy coming off knee surgeries. Pound the ball, use these 2 te sets and go more traditional b/c rob is not physically dynamic anymore. That's all it is. If he can't run, he needs to stop RO, if he can't step in throws, he needs to be taken off the field. The season is underway and Kirk is more able. That will never happen though, not b/c it doesn't make sense but b/c Shanny/Rob are too hard headed. Shanny can never be wrong and he doesnt scold his son Off Cord. afterall the shanny plan has always been 2 part- get kyles career advanced and get Mike into HOF. theyve already gone all in despite any sort of longterm costs to fans and franchise before/after Rob. We do not win with the RO this year. Other teams can, b/c they protect their QB (and certainly don't send him downfield for a pass against the steelers, thanks Kyle).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,698
|
Quote:
As for the RO I think all the RO teams wanted to get a feel for how the refs were going to call it and how defenses were going to adjust. No matter what this week the offense needs to come out on track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parkville
Posts: 464
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
Quote:
To quote the most scholarly source, he's a "bama" or "ma' ba" which has yet to be fully understood..... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: One Night Only: Offensive Packers-Redskins Game Review, Mythbusters Edition
So what your saying is teams are not affraid of RGII's arm unless he is able to run which I agree. He is not a pocket passer and needs his legs to be affective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|