Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


ROMO??? Why not JC???

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2006, 05:53 PM   #46
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Don't hurt me! I can explain! :cheeky-sm

I think this stat is purely product of system. Since in Gibbs' offense the backs would block almost exclusively on many passing plays, they never had a chance to catch the passes. Brunell would throw passes away last year, whereas now, he completes those passes to the back. It would fortify your explination of Brunell's increased completion percentage this year.

It's certainly been a positive change. Brunell is averaging near a half yard more per attempt this year. (6.7 in 2005, 7.1 in 2006).

I would argue that this is an instance of him grasping the system (Saunders' history involves a ton of checkdowns), but no matter how you explain it, it doesn't change what hes done.
i knew you could do it. i'd agree it doesn't change what he's done, which is lose games without getting interceptions. not sure why're you're content with Brunell still grasping the system by midseason, but is part of Al Saunders system using the other receivers? just for reference, what are the Manning brothers YPA?
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-30-2006, 05:54 PM   #47
TheFunBunch79
Camp Scrub
 
TheFunBunch79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cumberland, Maryland
Posts: 35
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan4Life View Post
Look at Gibbs avatars. Thats the way he looks all game long. No passion no concern no urgency no excitement no interest no winning record. This is why will not see JC.

i like my avatar...

go skins
TheFunBunch79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 06:02 PM   #48
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilbert07 View Post
Campbell might not be able to outplay Brunell now, but he would deliver an intangible: a spark. Brunell gives me little hope that he'll ever do anything but "manage" more losses and an occasional win.
I hope you are right. It would be exciting to see JC come in and perform like we are all hoping he will some day. If the coaches decide that will be this week or next, I'll be routing for him. We all will.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 06:28 PM   #49
mheisig
The Starter
 
mheisig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan4Life View Post
If an employee at any job wasnt up to par in their duties and was constantly being told he had better do a better job or else but no repercussions came from it 9 times outta 10 that person would continue to do half assed work because he knows he can get away with it. But if the CEO,president whatever the case may be came in and said look ya slack bastard do your job right or your will be demoted,fired,etc... It may change their tune.
Ah the beatings will continue until morale improves.

They'll work harder, but only long enough to find a job/team elsewhere.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual.
mheisig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 06:48 PM   #50
BMF21
Special Teams
 
BMF21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 56
Posts: 135
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigD View Post
FIRST, I want to say that I am not sold on Romo being that great, I am not saying that he will be playing in the pro-bowl (so if you do have a bad comment about his play save it to yourself, I am talking about QB changes here), but here what I do see, he did OK against a good D.

This is intersting since Dallas has to play Washington next Sunday. This reassures me that Jason Campbell would actually do better than MB. If not, then you will know little more about your QB of the future and if you might have to draft another one.

I mean in the preseason JC would play in the 3rd or 4th quarter against the 2nd or 3rd Defense and he still didn't look like he could play that well.

The otehr thing is the play-calling, I was watching Redskins pregame on Fox5 and they were talking about how AS is not the one calling the plays, I mean he is calling them but with restrictions. They were saying that they plays the Redskins are running right now are very similar to the ones last year. They said the Gibbs is not letting AS open-up his play-book.

I have to be honest that I was not looking forward to the game next Sunday, but now it will be worth watching, who knows any given sunday a team could win. I am not saying that Dallas will win but hey at least it LOOKS LIKE we have a shot at a chance. Meanwhile, the G-wimps will have an easy game against the Texans, I hate them just as much as you guys do.

I think changes are good sometimes regardless of the position and I think JC deserves a shot. Look at Leinart now or remeber Roethlisberger when he was a rookie, Chris Simms did OK, Delhome did OK, Jason Campbell should be a starter.
your orgainzation did the right thing,....at least they realize a change needed to be made and not waited until the season is over to see if they can still save it..........Washington, cant win with MB,...period, they cant, and if Jason Campbell is not given a chance soon,....then JG and the organization is to blame.........F**k waiting.......now is the time
__________________
I'm tired of these Mutha F***ing Snakes on this Mutha F***ing plane!!!!
BMF21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 06:56 PM   #51
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined View Post
i knew you could do it. i'd agree it doesn't change what he's done, which is lose games without getting interceptions. not sure why're you're content with Brunell still grasping the system by midseason, but is part of Al Saunders system using the other receivers? just for reference, what are the Manning brothers YPA?
Eli is 7.2 almost exactly par with Brunell. Peyton is something ridiculous like 8.0, but hes one of the greatest ever.

And as for the losing games comment, how can you even say that without trying to mislead. You lose games as a team. You aren't a worse player if you are on a losing team. You aren't a better player if you play on a winner. But if you absolutely have to assign blame, it goes on the defense for being the 28th ranked D, obviously.

I have no worries about Brunell learning/having learned/is still learning the system. None. Whatsoever.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 07:02 PM   #52
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Eli is 7.2 almost exactly par with Brunell. Peyton is something ridiculous like 8.0, but hes one of the greatest ever.

And as for the losing games comment, how can you even say that without trying to mislead. You lose games as a team. You aren't a worse player if you are on a losing team. You aren't a better player if you play on a winner. But if you absolutely have to assign blame, it goes on the defense for being the 28th ranked D, obviously.

I have no worries about Brunell learning/having learned/is still learning the system. None. Whatsoever.
i agree you lose as a team, but you also win as a team and when one side is hurting, you rely on the other to try and do what it takes to win. all we've seen is Brunell play exactly as if he still had the top 5 defense he's had while he's been here. and you're really not worried about Brunell and our offensive system? you must have him on fantasy then because the only stat you don't seem worried about is W-L.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 10:22 PM   #53
Crat92
Special Teams
 
Crat92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 51
Posts: 474
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Is Patrick Ramsey some where laughing?
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING!
Crat92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 11:06 PM   #54
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined View Post
i agree you lose as a team, but you also win as a team and when one side is hurting, you rely on the other to try and do what it takes to win. all we've seen is Brunell play exactly as if he still had the top 5 defense he's had while he's been here. and you're really not worried about Brunell and our offensive system? you must have him on fantasy then because the only stat you don't seem worried about is W-L.
Well, W-L is the one important stat of course, but W-L doesn't tell you how well a guy is playing, so its useless to regurgitate. We are 2-5. We should switch our roster with that of the Jets! I mean, they are 4-4.

I'm not sure how Brunell should play more like he has a weak defense. Should he throw more INTs? Should he remind his offensive line to not hold because they can't recover from it? Should he pay the defensive line to not rush hard? I kinda see what you are trying to say, but I don't think its reasonable to have the offense play out of character to rectify a situation created by the defense playing out of character all season long.

I think this is a great case of two wrongs not making a right.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:49 AM   #55
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crat92 View Post
Is Patrick Ramsey some where laughing?
Yep, on the Jets' bench. He's laughing to keep from crying over the increased playing time he's seeing there.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:58 AM   #56
TheBigD
Special Teams
 
TheBigD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crat92 View Post
Is Patrick Ramsey some where laughing?
Even though I am not a Redskins fan, but I do like the rest of Washington sports teams. There is something about Washington having players not playing so well here and once they are gone they become superstars (I know not all of them) and also the ones who do really well come here to suck and retire (Lloyd, Randel El, stackhouse and even Jordan well he was old to begin with). Brad Johnson won a super bowl, Trent Green did well in St. Louis and KC, you look at the basketball players we traded away, Webber, Hamilton...This city sure knows how to find the next big thing and then trade them away.

Ramsey on the other hand, is not one of those, he was never good. That guy lacked everything except for arm strength. He used to hand out INTs like candy on Halloween night.

Commentators keep talking about Dallas not having a good QB since Aikman left, when was the last time Washington had a great one and how many has Washington put under the center since late 90s.
TheBigD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 09:52 AM   #57
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
we traded away, Webber, Hamilton...
Jordan chased Hamilton out of town, and I've never forgiven him!
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:08 AM   #58
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I'm not sure how Brunell should play more like he has a weak defense. Should he throw more INTs? Should he remind his offensive line to not hold because they can't recover from it? Should he pay the defensive line to not rush hard? I kinda see what you are trying to say, but I don't think its reasonable to have the offense play out of character to rectify a situation created by the defense playing out of character all season long.
If Brunell could throw on the move into tight spaces to his primary receivers downfield, he A) wouldn't be throwing any more INTs than the guaranteed punts we've been getting checking down on 3rd and long B) COULD recover from holding penalties that you imply the same o-line as last year is suddenly getting a rash of.

were those two tosses in Dallas, deep, and over the middle, to Moss in the 4th quarter last year 'out of character' for Brunell? you bet. did they win us that game and get credited for 'turning around' the season? yep.

has Brunell even tried something like that this year, whatever it takes to win a game, even if its 'out of character'? no. so lo and behold, here we are with no season turnaround.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:16 AM   #59
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

We shouldnt compare brunell to last years number because last year's numbers sucked. We had a horrible offense last year, and it's a little bit better this year. This year, we need to take more risks on offense because we don't have a consistent defense. Las year Turnovers were the deciding factor, because with our defense we werent gonna give up a lot of points as long as we didnt' turn the ball over and give them good field position. This year, we let them score no matter where they start, making the turnover margin meaningless. Brunell has to cut out this conservative crap and take risks, or else we need someone in there that will.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:28 AM   #60
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Zimmermans View Post
We shouldnt compare brunell to last years number because last year's numbers sucked. We had a horrible offense last year, and it's a little bit better this year. This year, we need to take more risks on offense because we don't have a consistent defense. Las year Turnovers were the deciding factor, because with our defense we werent gonna give up a lot of points as long as we didnt' turn the ball over and give them good field position. This year, we let them score no matter where they start, making the turnover margin meaningless. Brunell has to cut out this conservative crap and take risks, or else we need someone in there that will.
That horrible offense was 11th overall in the league and broke team records for rushing and receiving. How horrible is that?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.18096 seconds with 10 queries