Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Should the Redskins offer S. Moss a new contract?
Yes 96 79.34%
No 25 20.66%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2011, 07:11 PM   #61
Dread-Skin
Special Teams
 
Dread-Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Towson area
Posts: 288
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjmorgan View Post
Drive killer. He drops too many bug play passes. I know he caught a lot this year, but he killed us too many times. Too worried about running before catching. Thank him, and let's move on. We need to get a big body receiver in to go along with Armstrong, maybe Banks.
Uncharacteristic year for drops. Looking at the roster we had zero depth. I clapped when Galloway was let go but I did scratch my head at DThomas some but playing in all 16 games at 31 and making a push to be considered for pro bowl- how can we turn on Moss? We are a team of midgets but Moss gets it done.
__________________
When do Brandon Banks authentics hit the market?
Dread-Skin is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-11-2011, 07:22 PM   #62
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I don't think that keeping Moss means that we won't get a #1 WR. Moss is a slot guy and since he would prob not command a lot of money, I'm sure the team could easily keep him and add that #1 WR (if the team choses to keep him).
That would be the smart thing to do. Resign Moss and try to sign one of the top tier FA [if we ever get around to it] to help him and Armstrong. We wont find a receiver in the draft that will contribute right away with all the other pressing needs we have.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 08:02 PM   #63
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
As in Eddie Royal who just had hip surgery?

Denver Broncos WR Eddie Royal recovering from hip surgery - ESPN
Vs haynesworth who still hasn't had the procedure to remove sand from his vagina? Definitely.. remember, colt Brennan had hip surgery too!
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 02:56 AM   #64
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,368
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Vs haynesworth who still hasn't had the procedure to remove sand from his vagina? Definitely.. remember, colt Brennan had hip surgery too!
I didn't know Colt Brennan was a speedy wide receiver.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 04:02 AM   #65
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I didn't know Colt Brennan was a speedy wide receiver.
He's a superstar that overcame many obstacles.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 01:25 PM   #66
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dread-Skin View Post
Who actually voted NO ?!!!!? $5 million a year- done. Why would we turn away the best receiver we have had this millenium? Age 32 ok, build around him but that WR screen of his and a lesser role and stretch his health/career out seems solid to me. Thats also not a lot of money to throw at our top receiver. Moss the Boss !!!!
$5mil a year is a bargain for Moss. We'd be stupid to let him go if that's all he's asking for in a 2 or 3-year deal.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 02:12 PM   #67
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,368
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
He's a superstar that overcame many obstacles.
If you are talking about Hawaii or this website, then you are correct.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 04:19 PM   #68
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

I said yes only because the Redskins do not have enough draft picks to fill all their needs. It least we know Santana Moss is productive. There is no guarantee a wide receiver draft pick will be successful and I would like to see the Skins get away from going after free agents all the time and start building through the draft.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 08:12 PM   #69
Bigreds77
Special Teams
 
Bigreds77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 214
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

This guy deserves to stay as long as he stays healthy.He came to Redskins to play and always gave 110%
Bigreds77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 09:00 PM   #70
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dread-Skin View Post
Who actually voted NO ?!!!!? $5 million a year- done. Why would we turn away the best receiver we have had this millenium? Age 32 ok, build around him but that WR screen of his and a lesser role and stretch his health/career out seems solid to me. Thats also not a lot of money to throw at our top receiver. Moss the Boss !!!!
You'd turn away the best receiver we've had this decade for the same reason you wouldn't offer Brett Favre a $20 million dollar contract despite a QB need: because the player you'd be paying for is available only in the past.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 09:46 AM   #71
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

I think our passing offense was one of the better units on the team and Moss was a key part of that unit.

Armstrong also gave solid production despite sitting behind Joey Galloway for the first few games.

We have a trio of yong WRs waiting an opportunity to earn their stripes.
We're a rebuilding team and a key aspect of team building is player development.
But, they'll need playing time and targets to prove their value and if another WR is brought in then we'll never know what these receivers could be given more targets/opportunity.

Then we also have 2 solid TEs that could be utilized in a more efficient/productive manner.

I expect an uptick in production from the passing game as a result of just having another year in the system and making better use of our current personnel.
Losing the main cog in our passing game removes the benefit of system fit/system knowledge.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 09:49 AM   #72
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,175
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
I think our passing offense was one of the better units on the team and Moss was a key part of that unit.

Armstrong also gave solid production despite sitting behind Joey Galloway for the first few games.

We have a trio of yong WRs waiting an opportunity to earn their stripes.
We're a rebuilding team and a key aspect of team building is player development.
But, they'll need playing time and targets to prove their value and if another WR is brought in then we'll never know what these receivers could be given more targets/opportunity.

Then we also have 2 solid TEs that could be utilized in a more efficient/productive manner.

I expect an uptick in production from the passing game as a result of just having another year in the system and making better use of our current personnel.
Losing the main cog in our passing game removes the benefit of system fit/system knowledge.

93 Catches
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 09:55 AM   #73
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

I'm not too worried, Kelly is poised for a breakout year.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 10:03 AM   #74
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
I'm not too worried, Kelly is poised for a breakout year.
Again!
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 10:05 AM   #75
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Santana's contract to void; will become free agent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dread-Skin View Post
Who actually voted NO ?!!!!? $5 million a year- done. Why would we turn away the best receiver we have had this millenium? Age 32 ok, build around him but that WR screen of his and a lesser role and stretch his health/career out seems solid to me. Thats also not a lot of money to throw at our top receiver. Moss the Boss !!!!
Most of the usual pessimists and a bunch of guys I've never heard of.


celts32, dewyane, diehard, enick17, GMScud, GTripp0012, hooskins, irish, itvnetop, jdlea, Mechanix544, redskin37, SBXVII, schndr_tdd, skinsfan69, skinznut, SolidSnake84, sportscurmudgeon, tjmorgan, VTSkins, wroadrunners
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.24450 seconds with 11 queries