Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Dockery Cut:

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2009, 06:01 PM   #1
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Dockery Cut:

Ok, some one with cap knowledge please help.

People keep posting how we can get all the free agents ...Haynesworth, Hall, Dockery, Canty and keep Taylor and even look for others. How can we do it? and are they correct in what they say ie; the thread starter. Is it possible?

Secondly, why are so many people or few people ready to shift Samuels to RT? #1 can he do it and #2 would he even want to?

Thirdly,(LOL) Why would we expierment with putting DD at RT or LT? He was used as a Guard cause he was not Tackle material. They tried to make the move with Wade cause he was taller and bigger but he could not do the job.

I'm not knocking DD I'm glad to have him back even if he did false start more often then anyone else.

I stand corrected it was not the thread starter. I think it was in another thread about free agency and salary cap I think.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 08:57 PM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Ok, some one with cap knowledge please help.

People keep posting how we can get all the free agents ...Haynesworth, Hall, Dockery, Canty and keep Taylor and even look for others. How can we do it? and are they correct in what they say ie; the thread starter. Is it possible?

Secondly, why are so many people or few people ready to shift Samuels to RT? #1 can he do it and #2 would he even want to?

Thirdly,(LOL) Why would we expierment with putting DD at RT or LT? He was used as a Guard cause he was not Tackle material. They tried to make the move with Wade cause he was taller and bigger but he could not do the job.

I'm not knocking DD I'm glad to have him back even if he did false start more often then anyone else.

I stand corrected it was not the thread starter. I think it was in another thread about free agency and salary cap I think.
if you cut springs (for 6.5mill) and taylor (for 8.5mill) you have about 27mill of space to work with.

rookies and tender offers can cost us up to 4mill (1.5 for monty/golston i believe, and our kicker signed his 1mill deal already). rookies should be 3mill-3.5mill.

haynes i believe would cost 12mill for 2009 (other people have said 7mill, but i don't think that'd be a workable, league approved and compliant type of contract for a 6 year 100mill deal with 35mill in signing bonus).

so that leaves you with about 8mill (though there can be a few small restructures etc left for maybe 2mill more if needed).

that leaves 8-10 to work with...

canty is probably 6mill for a first year. dockery (hopefully) would only be 4... hall would probably be 5-6.

so it'd be cut springs/haynesworth, sign one other major FA and 1-2 minor ones.

2 big names, 1-2 very low level guys (kendall/depth LB/etc).
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 07:14 PM   #3
TheSmurfs22
The Starter
 
TheSmurfs22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
Re: Dockery Cut:

Get Dock back to DC!!!!
TheSmurfs22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 07:17 PM   #4
TheSmurfs22
The Starter
 
TheSmurfs22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
Re: Dockery Cut:

I heard that Jason Brown may be St. Louisy bound possibly or to another midwest team.
Wouldn't mind Haynesworth at all, but I always get worried when the Skins throw a shit ton of money at someone, they come here and never live up to their price tag.
TheSmurfs22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 08:49 PM   #5
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Dockery Cut:

i'd like foxworth (CB), dockery (LG), cromwell (LB) and draft orakpo (DE)... if we get haynesworth (and let golston walk for a 2nd or high 3rd) and draft two OL with that 2nd(or 3rd) and our original 3rd.

reinhart isn't going to be starting in two years. not going to happen (buges et al have been extremely unimpressed with his progress so far).

I think 5mill average is way too high for a guy that's probably the 20th best starting LG. hopefully we can get him for a 3-4mill hit this year, that's much more reasonable... he's not a pro-bowl type player and never will be.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 08:53 PM   #6
Nflnick11
Special Teams
 
Nflnick11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 432
Re: Dockery Cut:

I think the pats will go after hall for a few reasons, because when Asante Samuel left, they figured they'd be fine, but besides ellis Hobbs, they never had a second corner, bring in deltha oneal and drafting terrence Wheatley in the second round, so belichiek knew he was Wrong about being fine with his regular corners, plus the pats have a good amount of money to spend. Also the one major red flag with hall is that he argues with coaches, but the same was said with moss, and that one didn't end up so bad after all
Nflnick11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 08:58 PM   #7
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Dockery Cut:

as far as the line moves... we don't have a spare LT, so samuels isn't moving. dockery is NOT a tackle (he's straight run blocking anyways), so kicking him out there would be a bad idea.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:30 PM   #8
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 45
Posts: 2,958
Re: Dockery Cut:

I guess I'm the only one who didn't really care for him when he was here. It seemed like his head wasnt into the game as much as it needed to be. He made a lot of mistakes. I say go for youth and build for the future.
__________________
I am the brute squad.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:43 PM   #9
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalEnigma21 View Post
I guess I'm the only one who didn't really care for him when he was here. It seemed like his head wasnt into the game as much as it needed to be. He made a lot of mistakes. I say go for youth and build for the future.
he was the 26th best starting OG i think when he walked... he's decent, but he'll never be a stud.

still, our OL is TERRIBLE right now. if samuels heals up well we've got one spot locked up. thomas (hopefully) will be back to being good and rabach is okay, kendall is ancient and we don't have a RT at all. so if he's 3-4mill per, dock is a decent deal and a huge upgrade.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:46 PM   #10
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
he was the 26th best starting OG i think when he walked... he's decent, but he'll never be a stud.

still, our OL is TERRIBLE right now. if samuels heals up well we've got one spot locked up. thomas (hopefully) will be back to being good and rabach is okay, kendall is ancient and we don't have a RT at all. so if he's 3-4mill per, dock is a decent deal and a huge upgrade.
Also i thought Dock improved markedly in '06, before he left us. Our rushing attack was stellar even after CP was hurt - Betts racked up more yards in the last 8 games than any RB save for LT - big Dock had a lot to do w/ that.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:46 PM   #11
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
he was the 26th best starting OG i think when he walked... he's decent, but he'll never be a stud.

still, our OL is TERRIBLE right now. if samuels heals up well we've got one spot locked up. thomas (hopefully) will be back to being good and rabach is okay, kendall is ancient and we don't have a RT at all. so if he's 3-4mill per, dock is a decent deal and a huge upgrade.
Agreed, I don't think anyone expects him to come and be a beast of an o-lineman (it'd be nice if he did). I think Dock could replace Kendall or if the Redskins do get Jason Brown, could be a nice insurance in case Thomas gets hurt (dude had back surgery!).
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:52 PM   #12
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Agreed, I don't think anyone expects him to come and be a beast of an o-lineman (it'd be nice if he did). I think Dock could replace Kendall or if the Redskins do get Jason Brown, could be a nice insurance in case Thomas gets hurt (dude had back surgery!).
I don't know if we'll get Brown and Dock. Either way, Thomas or Kendall are going to be gone. We're definitely not considering either of those guys to be insurance policies for current players.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 11:55 PM   #13
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I don't know if we'll get Brown and Dock. Either way, Thomas or Kendall are going to be gone. We're definitely not considering either of those guys to be insurance policies for current players.
Well I don't think Brown would be anyone's insurance, and come to think of it, you're right, we wouldn't get both Dock and Brown. I do want Brown though.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 04:47 AM   #14
RedskinPete
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
Re: Dockery Cut:

Is Dock one of those pickups that looks good now but turns out bad? Why did the Bill give up on him? Is thier someone else better in the draft or FA? Were taking a big chance on Hall so I like the next few pick up to be more of a sure things!
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 06:24 AM   #15
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
Re: Dockery Cut:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinPete View Post
Is Dock one of those pickups that looks good now but turns out bad? Why did the Bill give up on him? Is thier someone else better in the draft or FA? Were taking a big chance on Hall so I like the next few pick up to be more of a sure things!
they paid a 3mill/year OG 7mill/year. that's pretty much all there is to it. they expected a top tier OL addition by taking our (at the time) 4th best lineman and vastly overpaying him, and then magically were surprised when they found out he played there the same way he played here.

I guess the forgot that the rest of that line wasn't coming with him.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.59821 seconds with 10 queries