|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
01-26-2006, 05:14 PM
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 111
|
Cooley Vs. Clark
How Does the NFL look Past Chris By God Cooley to add on Demond clark of all people to the Pro Bowl?How can they not see Cooleys 2 strong years,Maybe Next year the Skins would get more recognition from the mainstream analysts and Media after they take the Lombardi trophy back to FedEx Field!
Clark:229 yds. and 2 TD's Cooley:774 yds. and 7 TD's????How do they take Clark?I am outraged and demand answers. Go Skins baby! Forget the "Bus" Hop onto CPort26 and ride to the super bowl! |
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 05:16 PM
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 54
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
I thought Cooley was the alternate. Perhaps he has "better things to do".
Update: Cooley is a fullback for PB purposes. My bad.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven Last edited by 70Chip; 01-26-2006 at 05:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 05:21 PM
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
  If cooley was listed at TE he would have got it. |
|
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 09:48 PM
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
Cooley didn't make the probowl because he was listed as a Fullback. That's why Desmond made it instead of Cooley.
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 10:16 PM
|
#5 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 10:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
Yeah but the thing is he isn't a normal FB and they took away all of his receiving stats on the pro bowl ballot just weeks before the end of the ballot. I don't understand how you don't count(or show the general NFL fans) the stats a person puts up.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2006, 08:54 AM
|
#7 |
|
\m/
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,831
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
They really need to get it straight next year, Cooley's role is much more tight end like in nature as opposed to fullback.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2006, 09:51 AM
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
I say good ... let's hope everybody in the league continues to underestimate him.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2006, 09:54 AM
|
#9 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 890
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
cooley was considered a FB for PBP and not a TE but perhaps NY he'll get the nod!!!
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2006, 01:08 PM
|
#10 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
he kinda got ripped but everyone in dc knows he is the real deal.im a football fan but who the hell is clark?
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2006, 01:34 PM
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Cooley Vs. Clark
clark is terrible....this is retarded...the nfl screwed up on this one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
