Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!?

DCsports · 05-31-2006, 09:14 PM

Lets face it.....James Thrash is getting old and his salary is increasing
reasons to drop James Thrash
1) Redskins have better offensive weapons than Thrash :
Our Redskin recievers (Moss, Lloyd, and Randel El) and Tight End (Chris Cooley) are all extremely talented players. James Thrash is not very talented
2) He could be considered as a good Special Teams Player......but lets get down to earth now, we HAVE RANDEL EL for Special Teams. Thrash is no longer needed. And if you go back and watch thrash's kick and escpecially punt returning he was pretty bad.
3) If we get rid of Thrash we can use his salary to bring better players to the Redskins team
4) Thrash is injury prone
5) Redskins have plenty of depth on the offensive end

05-31-2006, 09:14 PM	#1
DCsports Camp Scrub Join Date: May 2006 Location: Lorton, Virginia Posts: 53	Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!? Lets face it.....James Thrash is getting old and his salary is increasing reasons to drop James Thrash 1) Redskins have better offensive weapons than Thrash : Our Redskin recievers (Moss, Lloyd, and Randel El) and Tight End (Chris Cooley) are all extremely talented players. James Thrash is not very talented 2) He could be considered as a good Special Teams Player......but lets get down to earth now, we HAVE RANDEL EL for Special Teams. Thrash is no longer needed. And if you go back and watch thrash's kick and escpecially punt returning he was pretty bad. 3) If we get rid of Thrash we can use his salary to bring better players to the Redskins team 4) Thrash is injury prone 5) Redskins have plenty of depth on the offensive end __________________ www.freewebs.com/dcsports Redskins vids, wizards vids, etc...check it out ~Kaäsh~

Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!?

Locker Room Main Forum