![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Where will the 'Skins rank offensively in '04? | |||
Top 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 23.81% |
Top 10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 59.52% |
Top 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 14.29% |
Top 20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Bottom of the barrel |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.38% |
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Where will the 'Skins rank offensively?
vote
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
I think they could definitely be a top 5 offense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
|
Top 5. This is Joe Gibbs we are talking about! And just look at all the talent we have on offense....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Top 10.
Two words : Clinton Portis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
I'm betting on the safe side, top 10 with plenty of potential for top 5.
Portis, Brunell, Coles, Gardner, Jacobs, with Gibbs calling the shots, seems like a potent attack to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
I'm thinking they're on the cusp of top 5, maybe 6th even. It will take a few games I think for them to really get their offense going. But once they do, watch out
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
I have to believe that they should be top 5 but I'm erring on the side of caution and going with a top 10.
I thought that they'd be top offense last season. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brazil, IN
Age: 54
Posts: 883
|
Top 10 but I think they can prove me wrong and be top 5. Next year if things stay the same top 5 for sure.
__________________
HTTR! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
If they stay relatively injury free they are top 5 no doubt. I'd bet on Brunell only getting in 12 games at most though so to be safe I vote for top 10. Man it'd be great if they just blew people up though. Like back in 90-91 when they dropped 30 on just about everyone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reston, VA
Age: 55
Posts: 450
|
I fearlessly predict they will easily finish in the top 32.
You can take that one to your bookie! But seriously, top 5 is what I expect.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 43
Posts: 5,455
|
Top ten should be easily reachable for them next year with Clinton Portis and Coles.
Who picked bottom of the barrel???
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: washington dc
Age: 43
Posts: 148
|
Top ten
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
No, I did not vote "Bottom of the Barrel" here either!!
Top ten looks right. The reason they won't be top 5 is because the wide receivers (as a group) are merely above average. They are not outstanding. Other than Coles, it is a group that is either mediocre or underachieving. You can take your pick of the adjective you prefer here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|