Superbowl D

[Waleo]

I don't know about you all but it looks like we have that 2004 D back. Remember that year we couldn't score period because of the outdated offense and Mark Brunell. With a healthy Jason, hopefully and that Superbowl D, we can do so serious damage. I like how everybody has nothing positive to truly say basically the national media. This is going to be an interesting season. I want to see what analyst or writer jumps on our bandwagon first.

[MTK]

It was 2005 actually.

The D looks promising but let's not get too ahead of ourselves. It's August.

[firstdown]

There's already a thread talking about the D.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

It was 2005 actually.

The D looks promising but let's not get too ahead of ourselves. It's August.

I think that our 2004 D was ranked better than our 2005 and thats what he is talking about.

[Waleo]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

It was 2005 actually.

The D looks promising but let's not get too ahead of ourselves. It's August.

Actually it was 2004. That was Joe's first year back. Look at the stats. We were 6-10 the D was awesome that year but we just sucked offensively. Google it you'll see.

[MTK]

My bad I thought we were talking about the playoff season since that's when we actually had a shot at the SB.

[SouperMeister]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

My bad I thought we were talking about the playoff season since that's when we actually had a shot at the SB.

If this D is as good as 2004, we will have a good shot at going deep in the playoffs this year. Defenders swarmed to the ballcarrier as well on Saturday as they did in any game last year. That bodes well for when the games count.