Offensive Report Card (Bucs game)

MTK · 09-13-2004, 12:17 PM

vote and discuss

Redskins_P · 09-13-2004, 12:31 PM

Voted B. We did a great job of controlling the clock late in the game, but we still could've put more points on the board. The passing game still needs some work, but overall we did enough to come up with the W.

kingerock · 09-13-2004, 12:31 PM

Gave them a "B" as we need to step it up in the passing game to get some pressure off Portis. He can't carry the ball 30 times a game all season.

bridaman51 · 09-13-2004, 12:32 PM

I gave it a low B. need to work on QB center exchange and a deeper pass threat.
QB- low B (did not do much but did not really hurt us either other than the exchange
RB- High B had the one big run then kinda fizzled out and got tough yards
WR- C kinda there nothing really much to talk about
TE/HB- Low A Blocked well, Cooley had nice catch
O line- A no sacks 100 yard rusher pretty well

JWsleep · 09-13-2004, 12:37 PM

B. I agree with how you put things, Bridaman. I think these things will come with time. THe Bucs and Kiffin are a good D, so that's some of it as well.

jbcjr14 · 09-13-2004, 12:47 PM

I gave them a B. Portis ran 29 times for 148 yds (3 ypc avg if you take out the 64 yd td run). Bucs made some good adjustments at the half to slow him down a bit. I also think the passing game will come around in a few weeks. There are going to be teams that will shut the run game down coming in the next few weeks and they will have to pass to win.

That Guy · 09-13-2004, 12:53 PM

C, run blocking wasn't great on most plays, QB/WR need to get more in sync, exchange errors shouldn't happen, brunell threw into a lot of double coverage and made that hand off mistake.

on the plus side, we beat a good D, ran out the clock and got portis good yardage from generally poort field position.

Big C · 09-13-2004, 01:17 PM

i was very tempted to give a C, because of our lack of passing offense. brunell wasnt very accurate, but we controlled the clock so well, so i went with a b. TB defense iss till good also

BrudLee · 09-13-2004, 01:18 PM

We beat a very good defense and controlled the clock. We had no sacks and one turnover. This was a solid performance.

If we don't improve one iota offensively, we will murder the Giants. However, this coaching staff isn't going to rest on its laurels.

CrazyCanuck · 09-13-2004, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrudLee

We beat a very good defense and controlled the clock. We had no sacks and one turnover. This was a solid performance.

I agree with this and I gave them a B. Nothing too amazing but they made very few mistakes and did what they needed to win the game.

d151b · 09-13-2004, 01:24 PM

i gave'em a C. Portis had the big run, the O-line yeilded no sacks. but there's not a whole lot of fluidness at this point in the season.

MTK · 09-13-2004, 02:16 PM

solid B.

They controlled the clock and in the process the game. No sacks allowed and only 1 turnover. Huge game by Portis. Betts needs to get more work as the season goes on, Portis isn't going to hold up with 25+ carries per game.

CRT3 · 09-13-2004, 02:41 PM

Controlled the clock in the last 4 minutes of the game and in the 1st quarter, otherwise the time of possesion goes to the Bucs.
No Sacks - But Brunnel did take a couple of wicked hits.
Run Game other then the long run was less then 3 yards a carry.
Fumbles
Unable to score inside the red zone.
Missed challenge oppurtunity.
Cooley caught a great one and dropped another
Garner had two bad drops
Coles and Thrash were missing in action
No way that is a B performance (B is above average, at least that is the grading scale they are using in Montgomery County Schools)
Average game I would say with much improvement needed. C

Big C · 09-13-2004, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRT3

Controlled the clock in the last 4 minutes of the game and in the 1st quarter, otherwise the time of possesion goes to the Bucs.
No Sacks - But Brunnel did take a couple of wicked hits.
Run Game other then the long run was less then 3 yards a carry.
Fumbles
Unable to score inside the red zone.
Missed challenge oppurtunity.
Cooley caught a great one and dropped another
Garner had two bad drops
Coles and Thrash were missing in action
No way that is a B performance (B is above average, at least that is the grading scale they are using in Montgomery County Schools)
Average game I would say with much improvement needed. C

Did you not see james thrash blocking?? they even had an article on espn praising thrash for helping open holes. it looked like he was playin some h-back, i think he was critical to the offense.

CRT3 · 09-13-2004, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big C

Did you not see james thrash blocking?? they even had an article on espn praising thrash for helping open holes. it looked like he was playin some h-back, i think he was critical to the offense.

Yes he blocked on the one long run for Portis. No what about the other 33 runs that we averaged 3 yards on

View Poll Results: Grade the offense
A	0	0%
B	19	61.29%
C	11	35.48%
D	1	3.23%
F	0	0%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

09-13-2004, 12:17 PM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,831	Offensive Report Card (Bucs game) vote and discuss

09-13-2004, 12:31 PM	#3
kingerock Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Killeen, TX Age: 49 Posts: 360	Gave them a "B" as we need to step it up in the passing game to get some pressure off Portis. He can't carry the ball 30 times a game all season. __________________ Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C.

09-13-2004, 12:37 PM	#5
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 56 Posts: 4,719	B. I agree with how you put things, Bridaman. I think these things will come with time. THe Bucs and Kiffin are a good D, so that's some of it as well. __________________ Hail from Houston!

09-13-2004, 12:47 PM	#6
jbcjr14 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 55 Posts: 2,015	I gave them a B. Portis ran 29 times for 148 yds (3 ypc avg if you take out the 64 yd td run). Bucs made some good adjustments at the half to slow him down a bit. I also think the passing game will come around in a few weeks. There are going to be teams that will shut the run game down coming in the next few weeks and they will have to pass to win. __________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.

09-13-2004, 12:31 PM	#2
Redskins_P Fight for old DC! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Aldie, VA Age: 47 Posts: 4,101	Voted B. We did a great job of controlling the clock late in the game, but we still could've put more points on the board. The passing game still needs some work, but overall we did enough to come up with the W.

09-13-2004, 12:32 PM	#4
bridaman51 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Roanoke Virginia Age: 47 Posts: 335	I gave it a low B. need to work on QB center exchange and a deeper pass threat. QB- low B (did not do much but did not really hurt us either other than the exchange RB- High B had the one big run then kinda fizzled out and got tough yards WR- C kinda there nothing really much to talk about TE/HB- Low A Blocked well, Cooley had nice catch O line- A no sacks 100 yard rusher pretty well

09-13-2004, 12:53 PM	#7
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	C, run blocking wasn't great on most plays, QB/WR need to get more in sync, exchange errors shouldn't happen, brunell threw into a lot of double coverage and made that hand off mistake. on the plus side, we beat a good D, ran out the clock and got portis good yardage from generally poort field position.

09-13-2004, 01:17 PM	#8
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 39 Posts: 4,453	i was very tempted to give a C, because of our lack of passing offense. brunell wasnt very accurate, but we controlled the clock so well, so i went with a b. TB defense iss till good also __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

09-13-2004, 01:18 PM	#9
BrudLee Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE Posts: 3,494	We beat a very good defense and controlled the clock. We had no sacks and one turnover. This was a solid performance. If we don't improve one iota offensively, we will murder the Giants. However, this coaching staff isn't going to rest on its laurels. __________________ There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.

09-13-2004, 01:24 PM	#11
d151b Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 157	i gave'em a C. Portis had the big run, the O-line yeilded no sacks. but there's not a whole lot of fluidness at this point in the season.

09-13-2004, 02:16 PM	#12
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,831	solid B. They controlled the clock and in the process the game. No sacks allowed and only 1 turnover. Huge game by Portis. Betts needs to get more work as the season goes on, Portis isn't going to hold up with 25+ carries per game.

09-13-2004, 02:41 PM	#13
CRT3 Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Rockville Age: 62 Posts: 795	Controlled the clock in the last 4 minutes of the game and in the 1st quarter, otherwise the time of possesion goes to the Bucs. No Sacks - But Brunnel did take a couple of wicked hits. Run Game other then the long run was less then 3 yards a carry. Fumbles Unable to score inside the red zone. Missed challenge oppurtunity. Cooley caught a great one and dropped another Garner had two bad drops Coles and Thrash were missing in action No way that is a B performance (B is above average, at least that is the grading scale they are using in Montgomery County Schools) Average game I would say with much improvement needed. C

Offensive Report Card (Bucs game)

Locker Room Main Forum