2003 Vs 2009 Redskins

[jamf]

It's amazing that 6 years after the Spurrier experiment we end up with virtually the same team, A patched up roster of questionable talent.

We hear the same complaints about Zorn and Spurrier.
The same goes for Campbell and Ramsey. Hell, Let's add Moss and Coles into the mix. The Offensive lines... Both are 5 man speed bumps.

Looking at both rosters, it's clear that the person who put both of these teams together has a facination for Running backs and disregard offensive linemen.

Could Spurrier and Zorn be solid head coaches who are victims of bad ownership? It's not unheard of. Shanahan was a bust in Oakland before winning superbowls with Denver. Belichek was a joke in Cleveland, Now he is considered a genius. Oakland and Cleveland are generally considered to be two of the worst franchises in the NFL.

Since Spurriers departure, The Redskins did not draft one linemen who can contribute to the team. instead they've added star cornerbacks, Runningbacks, WRs, Safeties and Linebackers.

Clearly patching up a few holes on the roster with stars doesn't work if there isn't a strong core to the team.
I think it's time for a savior to arrive and blow up this mess. if you look at the Seahawks a few years go, They rebuilt their team around the line. They had the best offensive line and it took them to a superbowl with a mediocre QB and an Overrated RB.

I hope someone will take over controll of the team and build it from the ground up.

BTW, Who would win, 2003 or 2009 Redskins?