Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Raiders' WR Porter to Test Free Agency

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2004, 12:30 PM   #1
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Raiders' WR Porter to Test Free Agency

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html

For all those Gardner haters out there (which, by now seems to include just about everyone but me), Porter has expressed doubt about returning to the Raiders. If he tests free agency, as he claims he intends to, he'll probably command a signing bonus of about $7 million, but he'd be a pretty good #2 wideout.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-25-2004, 12:45 PM   #2
EEich
The Starter
 
EEich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 61
Posts: 1,001
No thank you. He's bad news.
EEich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 01:18 PM   #3
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
I'd rather stick with Gardner
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 02:00 PM   #4
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
Porter is a home town guy. He played high school ball in DC. I think he would be a good #2 also. He has size and pretty good speed.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 02:01 PM   #5
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEich
No thank you. He's bad news.

EEICH, why do you say he's bad news? Have you heard anything? I'm just asking because I haven't heard anything too negative about him.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 02:53 PM   #6
Shane
Special Teams
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
Porter doesn't have the focus in my opinion to be someone you can rely on. I wouldn't trade any of our receivers for him. He hasn't been able to step up to be the guy his whole career and is seeing a bunch of rookies and young players catch all the balls at a time he should be coming into his own. He probably will never be able to star for any team.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 04:29 PM   #7
aehs77
Special Teams
 
aehs77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: silver spring
Age: 40
Posts: 486
our recievers would be tight if they get out of the current funk they are in
aehs77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 06:24 PM   #8
Skins4SB
Camp Scrub
 
Skins4SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 38
I wouldn't mid having him over Gardner. I don't hate Gardner, but I think Porter has better hands than Gardner. Why is Porter bad news?
Skins4SB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 09:17 PM   #9
skins009
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
We don't need Porter, we don't have the money, and we are fine at WR. What we need is to have surgery on LC toe, so he can be a big time threat again.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 09:21 PM   #10
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
I don't like the guy, but if we're going after another receiver (I like Gardner) we could try for Mike Williams out of USC (kinda)
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2004, 10:38 PM   #11
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
he'd be an upgrade over gardner but is gonna want way too much money for a #2 wr. I'd rather target a rookie wr in with one of our 1st 2 picks.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2004, 09:17 AM   #12
kingerock
Special Teams
 
kingerock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 360
I would like to see a consistant team for atleast 2 seasons. We aren't fixing anything with free agency, we've been down that road for years and it's never worked. I think Porter or Williams from USC would be great. But we have a roster of potentially great WRs in Coles, Gardner, Thrash, McCants and Jacobs. any of those guys have a breakout season and get in sync with a QB and we are marching to a championship with our great defense.
__________________
Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C.
kingerock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2004, 10:39 AM   #13
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
The last thing the Skins need to do is change all the pieces again this offseason. they need to let a plan unfold for once and not blow it up and start over again like they have done every offseason since Danny joined us. Porter for Gardner is an unneccesary switch. I think the Redskins should just keep the current players and fill holes with draft picks and work on molding the current roster. You can't make a big free agency splash every year.
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2004, 11:57 AM   #14
Drift Reality
Impact Rookie
 
Drift Reality's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
Receiver isn't the main issue with this team. They really need a speed rusher on the outside and a better center.

I'm really not that concerned about the receivers and they already have too much money invested in that area of the team.
Drift Reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2004, 12:31 PM   #15
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
i tend to agree with celts32. the skins need to keep most of the players they have. make a few changes, maybe make some changes in gibbs' system, open things up just a little more to better fit ramsey and portis. shopping gardner around isn't a bad idea but not for another wr, an o-lineman or something.
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.77977 seconds with 10 queries