![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Raiders' WR Porter to Test Free Agency
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html
For all those Gardner haters out there (which, by now seems to include just about everyone but me), Porter has expressed doubt about returning to the Raiders. If he tests free agency, as he claims he intends to, he'll probably command a signing bonus of about $7 million, but he'd be a pretty good #2 wideout. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 61
Posts: 1,001
|
No thank you. He's bad news.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
I'd rather stick with Gardner
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Porter is a home town guy. He played high school ball in DC. I think he would be a good #2 also. He has size and pretty good speed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,101
|
Quote:
EEICH, why do you say he's bad news? Have you heard anything? I'm just asking because I haven't heard anything too negative about him. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
|
Porter doesn't have the focus in my opinion to be someone you can rely on. I wouldn't trade any of our receivers for him. He hasn't been able to step up to be the guy his whole career and is seeing a bunch of rookies and young players catch all the balls at a time he should be coming into his own. He probably will never be able to star for any team.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: silver spring
Age: 40
Posts: 486
|
our recievers would be tight if they get out of the current funk they are in
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 38
|
I wouldn't mid having him over Gardner. I don't hate Gardner, but I think Porter has better hands than Gardner. Why is Porter bad news?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
|
We don't need Porter, we don't have the money, and we are fine at WR. What we need is to have surgery on LC toe, so he can be a big time threat again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
I don't like the guy, but if we're going after another receiver (I like Gardner) we could try for Mike Williams out of USC (kinda)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,814
|
he'd be an upgrade over gardner but is gonna want way too much money for a #2 wr. I'd rather target a rookie wr in with one of our 1st 2 picks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 360
|
I would like to see a consistant team for atleast 2 seasons. We aren't fixing anything with free agency, we've been down that road for years and it's never worked. I think Porter or Williams from USC would be great. But we have a roster of potentially great WRs in Coles, Gardner, Thrash, McCants and Jacobs. any of those guys have a breakout season and get in sync with a QB and we are marching to a championship with our great defense.
__________________
Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
The last thing the Skins need to do is change all the pieces again this offseason. they need to let a plan unfold for once and not blow it up and start over again like they have done every offseason since Danny joined us. Porter for Gardner is an unneccesary switch. I think the Redskins should just keep the current players and fill holes with draft picks and work on molding the current roster. You can't make a big free agency splash every year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Receiver isn't the main issue with this team. They really need a speed rusher on the outside and a better center.
I'm really not that concerned about the receivers and they already have too much money invested in that area of the team. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
i tend to agree with celts32. the skins need to keep most of the players they have. make a few changes, maybe make some changes in gibbs' system, open things up just a little more to better fit ramsey and portis. shopping gardner around isn't a bad idea but not for another wr, an o-lineman or something.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|