Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Lombardi's column

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2010, 04:20 PM   #1
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Lombardi's column

NFL.com news: Shanahan must reevaluate how he runs Washington

I think he makes a lot of great points.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 05:19 PM   #2
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Lombardi's column

Very true. Larry Johnson did not deserve to make the team when performed against 4th stringers. However, even on this board, there was a lot of jumping from joy from that performance. However, I distinctly remember him completely whiffing on a block. It didn't matter because they guy was adequately blocked, but that shit should not fly simply because it didn't make the stat sheet. He looked slow.

The only guys they got right was a handful of guys like Jason Campbell(jettisoning him=good), Lorenzo Alexander, Laron Landry, etc.

The 2001 Broncos's payroll also broke our 2000 payroll record, so don't pretend that Shanahan has been the toast of GM'ing.

Donovan McNabb is quite literally on his last legs. Without his mobility, he is not that great of a quarterback, and he's losing it fast due to aging.

Our o-line is in shambles - by the time everyone clicks on their, like the new rookies and stuff, yeah McNabb is either sitting on IR or released.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 05:38 PM   #3
skinster
Impact Rookie
 
skinster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
Re: Lombardi's column

So true, I've been saying this since the moment he got hired. Great coach, horrible with personel matters. We have zero talent on our team with GAPING holes on the D-line, O-line, and WR core. Trading a second and a third for McNabb was a joke; it is the same thing we've been doing for years. Trading away the future to attempt to be in mediocrity forever. Sometimes it works are we are mediocre, but mostly it doesn't and we suck. McNabb just doesn't have the talent around him to do anything. I do believe we are better with him, but our goal is to reach a superbowl, and to attempt to do anything but build a team that has potential to make it there is horrible. It is clear that we are a few years away from even hoping to get to that status. And believe me you, I will be super pissed if we as much as swap 7th round picks in order to attain a veteran that will not be around 3 years from today.
skinster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 05:47 PM   #4
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
Re: Lombardi's column

It is refreshing to read a sports writer that has enough intelligence to jump off the AH hate bandwagon and talk about something more important, like what it will take to get this team going in the right direction. It is almost like this guy has been on our sight and reading some the more productive posts.
This team is not showing any signs of continuity or small amounts of improvement. Especially the defense which is chasing it's tail. The AH distraction is gone and it is time for the normal process of grading our coaches, players and scouts.
The switch to the 3-4 was a big mistake and created more player needs and seriously reduced the over all level of play on our team. Shanahan can't un-ring that bell now. If we are going to stick to the 3-4 we will have even more player needs added to our ever growing laundry list of positions we will have to fill.
It is refreshing to have someone lay a little blame on the coaching staff and FO.
Shanahan needs to guard against coming off as an unbending inflexible little dictator like the recently fired Denver coach Josh McDaniel. Nobody is perfect and Shanahan needs to admit and man up when he is wrong.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 06:36 PM   #5
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Lombardi's column

Bruce Allen has done a fantastic job at the job he was brought in here to do. Unfortunately, he does so with the title of GM, and he's doing about 40% of the duties of an everyday NFL GM.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 06:40 PM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Lombardi's column

While it's clear in hindsight that this team did not have the personnel to run the 3-4, the assumption that we had the personnel to run the 4-3 is based on another assumption that Albert Haynesworth would have been both a good soldier, and a dominant player in the scheme. Perhaps, but I don't think it's any more likely than it would have been running the 3-4, but without the feud between Shanahan and Haynesworth in the offseason.

I think the assumption is that we would have put Orakpo at DE in the 4-3, but we would have had the same problem against the run then that we did this year, not enough run defenders to keep blockers off Fletcher. That changes if Haynesworth eats blockers...but, you know, that could have happened in the 3-4 as well.

We're caught in between two defensive fronts right now, and need to go one way or the other in the offseason. No riding the middle.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 06:52 PM   #7
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
Re: Lombardi's column

I really respect Lombardi's opinion and he's 100% correct in his article. Shanahan and Allen have made some poor decisions in their first year. Gotta blow it up and start over, like Tampa Bay did....and somewhat how New England is doing with their defense.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 11:35 PM   #8
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I really respect Lombardi's opinion and he's 100% correct in his article. Shanahan and Allen have made some poor decisions in their first year. Gotta blow it up and start over, like Tampa Bay did....and somewhat how New England is doing with their defense.
The HUGE difference between the way Tampa did business in terms of rebuilding and the Skins is that Tampa accumulated draft picks and used them proficiently such that there are 15 rookies on their squad.


The Skins have traded off draft picks so that they don't have very many.


And from last year's draft, they got Trent Williams as a solid contributor and ...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 08:44 AM   #9
LongTimeSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
LongTimeSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 63
Posts: 515
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
The HUGE difference between the way Tampa did business in terms of rebuilding and the Skins is that Tampa accumulated draft picks and used them proficiently such that there are 15 rookies on their squad.


The Skins have traded off draft picks so that they don't have very many.


And from last year's draft, they got Trent Williams as a solid contributor and ...
Let me finish that SC...

"And from last year's draft, they got Trent Williams as a solid contributor and ..." a conglomeration of used up veterans that have already seen their glory days pass them by but are still collecting one last big paycheck.
__________________
...skins fan since 72 and still breathin'!
LongTimeSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2010, 02:55 PM   #10
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by LongTimeSkinsFan View Post
Let me finish that SC...

"And from last year's draft, they got Trent Williams as a solid contributor and ..." a conglomeration of used up veterans that have already seen their glory days pass them by but are still collecting one last big paycheck.

Sadly, you are much closer to "correct" than you are to "incorrect". :vomit:
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 07:28 PM   #11
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
Re: Lombardi's column

Shanahan is a respected offensive coach. Shanahan went from being a QB to being an offensive coordinator to being a Head Coach that ran offense. Shanhan has never coached a defense and has zero experience coaching a defense.
Rather than hiring a very qualified defensive coordinator and letting him run his own defense, he took upon himself to dictate what defense his team was going to run and then hired a coach. Kind of like when Snyderatto hired Zorn to be offensive coordinator before hiring the head coach. No respected defensive coach will come into that kind of situation where he is dictated what defense he has to run.
This is a case where Shanahan got involved with something that he has little experience doing. In fact none of Shanahan's defenses in Denver were base 3-4 and the Redskins have never been a base 3-4. Most of the players on the Redskins defense have not played in 3-4 as the base defense. Not a good marriage.
I will be curious to see if Shanahan will show any flexibility going forward.
Or will it remain his way or the highway?
Snyder learned the lesson, let professionals that know what they are doing run your team.
Is Shanhan open to learning the same lesson?
Shanahan should let defensive coaches run the defense, personnel men run the FO and he should stick to running to what he knows best, running the offense.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2010, 11:39 PM   #12
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
Shanahan is a respected offensive coach. Shanahan went from being a QB to being an offensive coordinator to being a Head Coach that ran offense. Shanhan has never coached a defense and has zero experience coaching a defense.
Rather than hiring a very qualified defensive coordinator and letting him run his own defense, he took upon himself to dictate what defense his team was going to run and then hired a coach. Kind of like when Snyderatto hired Zorn to be offensive coordinator before hiring the head coach. No respected defensive coach will come into that kind of situation where he is dictated what defense he has to run.
This is a case where Shanahan got involved with something that he has little experience doing. In fact none of Shanahan's defenses in Denver were base 3-4 and the Redskins have never been a base 3-4. Most of the players on the Redskins defense have not played in 3-4 as the base defense. Not a good marriage.
I will be curious to see if Shanahan will show any flexibility going forward.
Or will it remain his way or the highway?
Snyder learned the lesson, let professionals that know what they are doing run your team.
Is Shanhan open to learning the same lesson?
Shanahan should let defensive coaches run the defense, personnel men run the FO and he should stick to running to what he knows best, running the offense.


I truly wish that I was as certain as you are that "Snyder learned the lesson".

True, Shanahan needs to let defensive coaches run the defense' that is not Shanahan's strangth. The problem here is that Haslett is a "defensive guy: and has been knonw as such for all of his NFL tenure.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 12:51 AM   #13
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
I truly wish that I was as certain as you are that "Snyder learned the lesson".

True, Shanahan needs to let defensive coaches run the defense' that is not Shanahan's strangth. The problem here is that Haslett is a "defensive guy: and has been knonw as such for all of his NFL tenure.
Yes, but it has been overly argued when people defend Haslett from fault is that Shanahan is the one that made the decision to switch to the 3-4. So the guy that made this important decision is not a defensive coach or expert in defense, much has any experience ever using the 3-4 defense on any of his teams. This was a poor decision.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 10:43 AM   #14
skinster
Impact Rookie
 
skinster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
Shanahan is a respected offensive coach. Shanahan went from being a QB to being an offensive coordinator to being a Head Coach that ran offense. Shanhan has never coached a defense and has zero experience coaching a defense.
Rather than hiring a very qualified defensive coordinator and letting him run his own defense, he took upon himself to dictate what defense his team was going to run and then hired a coach. Kind of like when Snyderatto hired Zorn to be offensive coordinator before hiring the head coach. No respected defensive coach will come into that kind of situation where he is dictated what defense he has to run.
This is a case where Shanahan got involved with something that he has little experience doing. In fact none of Shanahan's defenses in Denver were base 3-4 and the Redskins have never been a base 3-4. Most of the players on the Redskins defense have not played in 3-4 as the base defense. Not a good marriage.
I will be curious to see if Shanahan will show any flexibility going forward.
Or will it remain his way or the highway?
Snyder learned the lesson, let professionals that know what they are doing run your team.
Is Shanhan open to learning the same lesson?
Shanahan should let defensive coaches run the defense, personnel men run the FO and he should stick to running to what he knows best, running the offense.

I see your point about shanny not being qualified to make defensive decisions, but I do respectfully disagree. If we look at all the defensives in the NFL when shanny was hired, there were 12 that ran a 3-4 and 20 that ran the 4-3. The top 5 scoring defenses were all in the 3-4. 9 of the top 13 scoring defenses were all in the 3-4. Green bay and Denver had switched that year. Green Bay went from the 21st ranked scoring defense to the 7th with the most turn overs, and Denver went from the 30th ranked defense to the 7th. I feel that with Albert being the NT and orakpo being the edge rusher, it looked like we had much better personel than Denver who had an amazing switch (of course that whole albert thing didn't work out, but if you say you expected this to happen you are lying).
From shanahans point of view it was a smart switch. Even now it still seems smart. The three teams that ran the 3-4 that weren't in the top 13 scoring defenses were Cleveland at 21, Miami at 25, and Kansas City at 29. This year, in points per game, kansas city and cleveland are tied at 8th while miami is 11th.
Switching to a 3-4 was for sure the right thing to do. It is the more proven defense, and when hiring a defensive coordinator, it is smart to go with one that runs the scheme that has worked the best. I am happy that we made the switch. I think it will end up paying off for us in the long run, especially with our two young star players, orakpo and landry, performing so well in it.
skinster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2010, 11:30 AM   #15
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Lombardi's column

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinster View Post
I see your point about shanny not being qualified to make defensive decisions, but I do respectfully disagree. If we look at all the defensives in the NFL when shanny was hired, there were 12 that ran a 3-4 and 20 that ran the 4-3. The top 5 scoring defenses were all in the 3-4. 9 of the top 13 scoring defenses were all in the 3-4. Green bay and Denver had switched that year. Green Bay went from the 21st ranked scoring defense to the 7th with the most turn overs, and Denver went from the 30th ranked defense to the 7th. I feel that with Albert being the NT and orakpo being the edge rusher, it looked like we had much better personel than Denver who had an amazing switch (of course that whole albert thing didn't work out, but if you say you expected this to happen you are lying).
From shanahans point of view it was a smart switch. Even now it still seems smart. The three teams that ran the 3-4 that weren't in the top 13 scoring defenses were Cleveland at 21, Miami at 25, and Kansas City at 29. This year, in points per game, kansas city and cleveland are tied at 8th while miami is 11th.
Switching to a 3-4 was for sure the right thing to do. It is the more proven defense, and when hiring a defensive coordinator, it is smart to go with one that runs the scheme that has worked the best. I am happy that we made the switch. I think it will end up paying off for us in the long run, especially with our two young star players, orakpo and landry, performing so well in it.
More "proven"? How about that Baltimore defense that won the Super Bowl? Or the Giants D that helped them get theirs?
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.03186 seconds with 10 queries